Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (27)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WESTERDAHL, J.
Right arrow Articles by INGVAR, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by WESTERDAHL, J.
Right arrow Articles by INGVAR, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press

research-article

Reproducibility of a Self-Administered Questionnaire for Assessment of Melanoma Risk

JOHAN WESTERDAHL*, HARALD ANDERSON**, HÅKAN OLSSON{dagger} and CHRISTIAN INGVAR*

* Department of Surgery, University Hospital S-221 85 Lund, Sweden.
** Southern Swedish Regional Tumour Registry, University Hospital S-221 85 Lund, Sweden.
{dagger} Department of Oncology, University Hospital S-221 85 Lund, Sweden.

BACKGROUND: The reproducibility of a self-administered questionnaire on different epidemiologlcal vanables was examined in a random sample of a cohort of healthy women from the South Swedish Health Care Region. An Identical questionnaire has previously been used for assessment of melanoma risk, In a population-based, matched, case-control study from the same region.

METHODS: Repeat questionnaires were completed on two occasions, 1–3 years apart, by 670 randomly selected subjects.In addition, exposure data from a case-control study were used to estimate the effect of misclassification.

RESULTS: Overall, there was a fair to good consistency between the answers on the two occasions for the various epidemiological variables. Exposure variables identified as risk factors for melanoma development were reasonably reproducible. The estimated proportion of agreement, A, ranged from 0.74 to 0 92, the average correct classification rate (assuming common sensitivity and specificity), {pi}, was ≥ 0.85 and the kappa coefficient, {kappa}, ranged between 0.52 and 0.83. However, the question on number of raised naevi on the arm was an exception since it had a lower test-retest reliability (A = 0.62, {pi} = 0.77, {kappa} = 0.40). When using data from the case-control study, the effect of the estimated random misclassiflcation was found to only slightly bias odds rations toward one.

CONCLUSIONS: Our questionnaire, used for assessment of melanoma risk, provided information with fair to good test-retest reliability, and corrected odds rations were found to be only slightly higher than observed odds ratios

Keywords questionnaires, reproducibility, reliability, misclassification, bias, melanoma, risk

Revised 1 September 1995


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch DermatolHome page
D. Lazovich, J. E. Stryker, J. A. Mayer, J. Hillhouse, L. K. Dennis, L. Pichon, S. Pagoto, C. Heckman, A. Olson, V. Cokkinides, et al.
Measuring Nonsolar Tanning Behavior: Indoor and Sunless Tanning
Arch Dermatol, February 1, 2008; 144(2): 225 - 230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. Berwick
Counterpoint: Sunscreen Use Is a Safe and Effective Approach to Skin Cancer Prevention
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2007; 16(10): 1923 - 1924.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
I.A.F. van der Mei, L. Blizzard, A-L. Ponsonby, and T. Dwyer
Validity and reliability of adult recall of past sun exposure in a case-control study of multiple sclerosis.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., August 1, 2006; 15(8): 1538 - 1544.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
S A Oliveria, M Saraiya, A C Geller, M K Heneghan, and C Jorgensen
Sun exposure and risk of melanoma
Arch. Dis. Child., February 1, 2006; 91(2): 131 - 138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
M J Nieuwenhuijsen
Design of exposure questionnaires for epidemiological studies
Occup. Environ. Med., April 1, 2005; 62(4): 272 - 280.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
V Rafnsson, J Hrafnkelsson, H Tulinius, B Sigurgeirsson, and J Hjaltalin Olafsson
Risk factors for cutaneous malignant melanoma among aircrews and a random sample of the population
Occup. Environ. Med., November 1, 2003; 60(11): 815 - 820.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
M. B. Veierod, E. Weiderpass, M. Thorn, J. Hansson, E. Lund, B. Armstrong, and H.-O. Adami
A Prospective Study of Pigmentation, Sun Exposure, and Risk of Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma in Women
J Natl Cancer Inst, October 15, 2003; 95(20): 1530 - 1538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
S. L. Harrison, P. G. Buettner, R. MacLennan, J. W. Kelly, and J. K. Rivers
How Good Are Parents at Assessing Melanocytic Nevi on Their Children? A Study Comparing Parental Counts, Dermatologist Counts, and Counts Obtained from Photographs
Am. J. Epidemiol., June 15, 2002; 155(12): 1128 - 1136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
S. Rosso, R. Minarro, S. Schraub, R. Tumino, S. Franceschi, and R. Zanetti
Reproducibility of skin characteristic measurements and reported sun exposure history
Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2002; 31(2): 439 - 446.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
M. Cockburn, A. Hamilton, and T. Mack
Recall Bias in Self-reported Melanoma Risk Factors
Am. J. Epidemiol., May 15, 2001; 153(10): 1021 - 1026.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.