Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BAILIE, R S
Right arrow Articles by BOURNE, D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BAILIE, R S
Right arrow Articles by BOURNE, D
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press

research-article

Surveillance for Equity in Cervical Cytology Screening

R S BAILIE and D BOURNE

Department of Community Health, University of Cape Town Medical School Observatory 7925, South Africa.

BACKGROUND: The opportunistic basis on which screening has been conducted in South Africa has resulted in multiple rescreening of a small proportion of the population (which excludes most women at high risk) and low population coverage. There has consequently been a failure of screening to impact on the incidence of cervical cancer in most of the population.

AIM: To propose the use of the ratio of smears showing cervical Intra-epithelial neoplasia (CIN) III : smears showing signs of malignancy as an indicator for the surveillance of equity in cervical cytology screening, and to apply this indicator to an area of the Western Cape of South Africa.

RESULTS: arked inequity in screening is demonstrated between metropolitan and non-metropolitan areas, and between different non-metropolitan districts. Inequity in screening between different age groups of women is also found, and this is associated with an inappropriately young age distribution of screening activity.

CONCLUSION: The application of this indicator in the routine surveillance of screening activity may be useful in monitoring progress towards the implementation of more equitable screening programmes, and the validity of the indicator should be tested in other settings.

Keywords cervical cytology, screening, equity, surveillance

Revised 1 July 1995


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Public Health (Oxf)Home page
H.-C. Chang, H.-Y. Hsiung, S.-I Chen, A. M.-F. Yen, and T. H.-H. Chen
Comparison of a community outreach service with opportunity screening for cervical cancer using Pap smears
J. Public Health Med., June 1, 2007; 29(2): 165 - 172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.