Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (41)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by TURNER, A. G
Right arrow Articles by SHUAIB, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by TURNER, A. G
Right arrow Articles by SHUAIB, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press

research-article

A Not Quite as Quick but Much Cleaner Alternative to the Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) Cluster Survey Design

ANTHONY G TURNER*, ROBERT J MAGNANI**, and MUHAMMAD SHUAIB{dagger}

* United Nations Statistical Division.
** Tulane University Medical Center, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine 1440 Canal Street, Suite 2200, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
{dagger} Dhaka University, Institute of Statistical Research and Training.

Reprint requests to: Robert J Magnani.

BACKGROUND: Although the Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) cluster survey methodology has been successfully used for assessing levels of immunization programme coverage in developing country settings, certain features of the methodology, as it is usually carried out, make it a less-than-optimal choice for large, national surveys and/or surveys with multiple measurement objectives. What is needed is a ‘middle ground’ between rigorous cluster sampling methods, which are seen as unfeasible for routine use in many developing country settings, and the EPI cluster survey approach.

METHODS: This article suggests some fairly straightforward modifications to the basic EPI cluster survey design that put it on a solid probability footing and render it easily adaptable to differing and/or multiple measurement objectives, without incurring prohibitive costs or adding appreciably to the complexity of survey operations. The proposed modifications concern primarily the manner in which households are chosen at the second stage of sample selection.

CONCLUSIONS: Because the modified sampling strategy maintains the scientific rigor of conventional cluster sampling methods while retaining many of the desirable features of the EPI survey methodology, the methodology is likely to be a preferred ‘middle ground’ survey design, relevant for many applications, particularly surveys designed to monitor multiple health indicators over time. The fieldwork burden in the modified design is only marginally higher than in EPI cluster surveys, and considerably lower than in conventional cluster surveys.

Keywords cluster sampling, modified EPI cluster survey

Revised 1 July 1995


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Public Opin QHome page
D. A. Marker
The Polls--Review: Methodological Review of "Mortality After the 2003 Invasion of Iraq: A Cross-Sectional Cluster Sample Survey"
Public Opin Q, June 1, 2008; 72(2): 345 - 363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Trop Med HygHome page
M. M. Ramos, H. Mohammed, E. Zielinski-Gutierrez, M. H. Hayden, J. L. R. Lopez, M. Fournier, A. R. Trujillo, R. Burton, J. M. Brunkard, L. Anaya-Lopez, et al.
Epidemic Dengue and Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever at the Texas-Mexico Border: Results of a Household-based Seroepidemiologic Survey, December 2005
Am J Trop Med Hyg, March 1, 2008; 78(3): 364 - 369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
C. Eusebio, H. Kuper, S. Polack, J. Enconado, N. Tongson, D. Dionio, A. DumDum, H. Limburg, and A. Foster
Rapid assessment of avoidable blindness in Negros Island and Antique District, Philippines
Br. J. Ophthalmol., December 1, 2007; 91(12): 1588 - 1592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever U.S.-Mexico Border, 2005
JAMA, November 14, 2007; 298(18): 2130 - 2132.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
J. E. Oye and H. Kuper
Prevalence and causes of blindness and visual impairment in Limbe urban area, South West Province, Cameroon
Br. J. Ophthalmol., November 1, 2007; 91(11): 1435 - 1439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Trop Med HygHome page
J. L. Vanden Eng, A. Wolkon, A. S. Frolov, D. J. Terlouw, M. J. Eliades, K. Morgah, V. Takpa, A. Dare, Y. K. Sodahlon, Y. Doumanou, et al.
Use of Handheld Computers with Global Positioning Systems for Probability Sampling and Data Entry in Household Surveys
Am J Trop Med Hyg, August 1, 2007; 77(2): 393 - 399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
E. T Luman, A. Worku, Y. Berhane, R. Martin, and L. Cairns
Comparison of two survey methodologies to assess vaccination coverage
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2007; 36(3): 633 - 641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
Z Wadud, H Kuper, S Polack, R Lindfield, M R Akm, K A Choudhury, T Lindfield, H Limburg, and A Foster
Rapid assessment of avoidable blindness and needs assessment of cataract surgical services in Satkhira District, Bangladesh
Br. J. Ophthalmol., October 1, 2006; 90(10): 1225 - 1229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
P. Milligan, A. Njie, and S. Bennett
Comparison of two cluster sampling methods for health surveys in developing countries
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2004; 33(3): 469 - 476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.