Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by COREN, S.
Right arrow Articles by HAKSTIAN, A R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by COREN, S.
Right arrow Articles by HAKSTIAN, A R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press

research-article

Screening for Stereopsis without the Use of Technical Equipment: Scale Development and Cross-Validation

STANLEY COREN and A RALPH HAKSTIAN

Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia 2136 West Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada 1Z4.

BACKGROUND: Although adequate stereopsis is important for many common sensory-motor activities, large-scale normative samples of the relationship between stereopsis and other individual difference variables are relatively scarce, and stereopsis is often not routinely tested even in settings where it might play an important role. This is, in part, due to the fact that data collection requires individual testing, the use of costly technical equipment and trained personnel.

METHOD: Beginning with a pool of 161 items and an initial sample of 542 Individuals, we developed a self-report Inventory—suitable for group testing, survey administration or rapid individual screening—possessing a high correlation with laboratory measures of stereopsis. The inventory was then cross-validated against laboratory measures of stereo-acuity in a separate sample of 573 subjects.

RESULTS: For the combined samples, the resulting 10-item Stereopsis Screening Inventory (SSI) correlated with laboratory measures of per cent stereopsis (r = 0.80). The inventory's reliability was assessed with a resulting internal consistency coefficient (alpha) of 0.88.

CONCLUSIONS: The SSI provides a fast, valid and inexpensive measure of uncorrected stereopsis which can be used for rapid screening or epidemiological surveys. The correct classification rate for the SSI was 84% for a low fence requiring 65% stereopsis or better, and 81% for a high fence of residual stereopsis of 25% or less. A conversion equaton, with estimated variability is also provided for point estimates of per cent stereopsis from the SSI scores. A copy of the inventory and scoring procedure is given in the Appendix.

Keywords stereopsis, vision testing, binocular vision, sensory deficits

Revised 1 June 1995


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.