Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bevan, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bevan, G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology, Vol 24, S103-S108, Copyright © 1995 by International Epidemiological Association

ARTICLES

Ways of seeing: explaining variations in use of acute hospital services

G Bevan
Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, UK.

BACKGROUND. In the US Medicare programme, hospitals are paid directly by activity. To provide incentives for efficiency, the US Federal Government has sought objective measures of inpatients' need for resources. In the UK National Health Service, resources are allocated for acute hospital services as part of a global budget to purchasers, who then contract with hospitals. To provide equity in resource allocation, the Department of Health in England, has sought objective measures of populations' need for resources. METHODS. Examination of policy and technology that has used variations in utilization of resources to derive objective measures of efficiency and equity. RESULTS. The technology of developing empirical measures of resources needed by patients has lacked information on outcomes, which is vital for measures of efficiency. The technology of developing empirical measures of resources needed by populations has relied on aggregate data. Analyses of specific procedures and conditions consistently find that these variations are explained by differences in medical practice and not by need. CONCLUSIONS. There is scope for multidisciplinary research to explain small area variations for specific procedures and conditions in resources used by populations. It seems unlikely, however, that governments will be interested in findings from this research.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.