Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FENNEMA, J S A
Right arrow Articles by VAN DEN HOEK, J A R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by FENNEMA, J S A
Right arrow Articles by VAN DEN HOEK, J A R
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1995 Oxford University Press

research-article

Validity of Self-Reported Sexually Transmitted Diseases in a Cohort of Drug-Using Prostitutes in Amsterdam: Trends from 1986 to 1992

J S A FENNEMA, E J C VAN AMEIJDEN, R A COUTINHO and J A R VAN DEN HOEK

Municipal Health Service, Department of Public Health and Environment Nieuwe Achtergracht 100, PO Box 20244, 1000 HE Amsterdam, The Netherlands

BACKGROUND: Rates of self-reported sexually transmitted diseases (STD) among drug-using prostitutes in Amsterdam have been shown to be declining. However, self reports may provide biased estimates.

METHODS: We determined the prevalence of risk indicators for and time trends in incorrect self-reported STD in a cohort of drug-using prostitutes. Rates of self-reported STD were validated with diagnosed STD from a special STD clinic for drug-using prostitutes.

RESULTS: Between 1986 and 1992, 314 STD were diagnosed in 85 (65%) of 131 studied prostitutes. Overall, 34% of diagnosed STD was not reported in the cohort, referred to as underreporting. For 40% of reported STD, no diagnosis was obtained (‘overreporting’). In spite of these misclassifications, absolute numbers of reported and diagnosed STD practically balanced. Underreporting was independently associated with longer residence In Amsterdam (OR = 2.34 per 5 years), more than six clinic visits between two cohort visits (OR = 0.31), daily use of non-parenteral drug (OR = 8.45) and mainly injecting heroin (OR = 6.93); overreporting was independently associated only with a lower frequency of clinic visits. Multivariate analyses showed that trends in underreporting and overreporting were in part explained by a higher number of visits in the cohort and by lower numbers of clinic visits between two cohort visits.

CONCLUSIONS: Self-reporting of STD in our cohort is unreliable and misclassification prevalent; risk factors for and associates of self-reported STD are biased. Inferences drawn from self reports are potentially misleading and therefore such data need to be validated. Trends in misclassification can be interpreted as recall errors and as a study participation effect. For monitoring of STD prevalences in relation to trends in sexual risk behavious, diagnosed STD should be used in preference to self reports.

Keywords sexually transmitted diseases, self-reports, validity, prostitutes, HIV, drug users, follow-up studies

Revised 1 March 1995


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.