© 1995 Oxford University Press
research-article |
Sources of Variability in Prevalence Rates of Alzheimer's Disease
* Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore, MD, USA.
Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health Baltimore, MD, USA.
Reprint requests to. Maria Corrada, Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 5501 Hopkins Bayview Circle, Room 1B.82, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
BACKGROUND: To investigate potential methodological reasons for the differences in published Alzheimer's disease (AD) prevalence rates.
METHODS: Studies reporting prevalence rates of AD have been published worldwide. These rates differ considerably, but may greatly reflect methodological differences.
RESULTS: All studies published between 1984 and 1993 that reported age-specific AD rates and sample sizes were included. Logistic regression identified variables that contribute to the variation in rates. Estimates of extrabinomial variation were also calculated.
CONCLUSIONS: Studies characterized by the following features yielded significantly higher rates: inclusion of mild cases, use of laboratory studies, ascertainment of a sample rather than the total population, inclusion of both urban and rural populations, non-use of computerized tomography (CT) scans, non-use of the Hachinski Ischemic Score, and no adjustment for false negatives. The odds of having AD increased 18% for every year of age. The variation in the age-specific prevalence rates of AD was approximately 15 times that expected by sampling variation. However, approximately 76% of this excess variation in rates could be accounted for by methodological differences.
Conclusions. After accounting for age, much of the variability in prevalence rates of AD in the published literature may be explained by differences in methodology. Some unexplained variation in prevalence rates, however, still remains.
Keywords Alzheimer's disease, prevalence, epidemiology
Revised 1 March 1995
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. H. Taylor Jr., F. A. Sloan, and P. Murali Doraiswamy Marked Increase in Alzheimer's Disease Identified in Medicare Claims Records Between 1991 and 1999 J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., July 1, 2004; 59(7): M762 - M766. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. D. Fisk, H. R. Merry, and K. Rockwood Variations in case definition affect prevalence but not outcomes of mild cognitive impairment Neurology, November 11, 2003; 61(9): 1179 - 1184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. M. de Figueiredo Methodological Aspects of Comparative Research in the Epidemiology of Alzheimer Disease Am J Geriatr Psychiatry, August 1, 2002; 10(4): 373 - 385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. H. Kawas and R. Brookmeyer Aging and the Public Health Effects of Dementia N. Engl. J. Med., April 12, 2001; 344(15): 1160 - 1161. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. C. Hendrie, A. Ogunniyi, K. S. Hall, O. Baiyewu, F. W. Unverzagt, O. Gureje, S. Gao, R. M. Evans, A. O. Ogunseyinde, A. O. Adeyinka, et al. Incidence of Dementia and Alzheimer Disease in 2 Communities: Yoruba Residing in Ibadan, Nigeria, and African Americans Residing in Indianapolis, Indiana JAMA, February 14, 2001; 285(6): 739 - 747. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. X. Hy and D. M. Keller Prevalence of AD among whites: A summary by levels of severity Neurology, July 25, 2000; 55(2): 198 - 204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Camicioli, P. Willert, J. Lear, S. Grossmann, J. Kaye, and P. Butterfield Dementia in Rural Primary Care Practices in Lake County, Oregon J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol, July 1, 2000; 13(2): 87 - 92. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Gao, H. C. Hendrie, K. S. Hall, and S. Hui The Relationships Between Age, Sex, and the Incidence of Dementia and Alzheimer Disease: A Meta-analysis Arch Gen Psychiatry, September 1, 1998; 55(9): 809 - 815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|