Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DELPIZZO, V.
Right arrow Articles by BORGHESI, J. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DELPIZZO, V.
Right arrow Articles by BORGHESI, J. L
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1995 Oxford University Press

research-article

Exposure Measurement Errors, Risk Estimate and Statistical Power in Case-Control Studies Using Dichotomous Analysis of a Continuous Exposure Variable

VINCENT DELPIZZO*,** and JOANNA L BORGHESI{dagger}

* Australian Radiation Laboratory Lower Plenty Rd, Yallambie 3085, Australia
{dagger} Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Melbourne 243 Grattan Street, Carlton 3053, Australia

BACKGROUND: Non-differential errors in exposure measurements have been shown to lead to differential misclassification of exposure. As a consequence, the common tenet that, in absence of bias, imprecise exposure assessment can only bias the risk estimates conservatively does not necessarily hold. We investigate the effects of exposure measurement errors on the risk estimate and on statistical power.

METHODS: We used a computer model that simulates a case-control study. We used both hypothetical data and data modelled on empirical measurements of environmental magnetic fields exposure.

RESULTS: Measurement errors are found to have a lesser impact on risk estimates and statistical power than would have been the case had misclassification been truly non-differential. However, for a given cutpoint, a bias away from the null cannot be excluded. The predominant direction of the errors is found to have important consequences on both the study power and the risk estimates.

CONCLUSIONS: When sufficient empirical data are available, computer modelling may give a more accurate estimate of the effects of measurement errors than algebraic corrections.

Keywords misclassification, risk estimate, statistical power, dichotomous analysis, magnetic fields

Revised 1 January 1995


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Eur J Public HealthHome page
A. Oliveira, E. Ramos, C. Lopes, and H. Barros
Self-reporting weight and height: misclassification effect on the risk estimates for acute myocardial infarction
Eur J Public Health, October 1, 2009; 19(5): 548 - 553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J EpidemiolHome page
N. Hakansson, P. Gustavsson, A. Sastre, and B. Floderus
Occupational Exposure to Extremely Low Frequency Magnetic Fields and Mortality from Cardiovascular Disease
Am. J. Epidemiol., September 15, 2003; 158(6): 534 - 542.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eval Health ProfHome page
O. Devine
The Impact of Ignoring Measurement Error when Estimating Sample Size for Epidemiologic Studies
Eval Health Prof, September 1, 2003; 26(3): 315 - 339.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
N Hakansson, B Floderus, P Gustavsson, C Johansen, and J H Olsen
Cancer incidence and magnetic field exposure in industries using resistance welding in Sweden
Occup. Environ. Med., July 1, 2002; 59(7): 481 - 486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.