Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by NOURJAH, P.
Right arrow Articles by FRERICHS, R. R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by NOURJAH, P.
Right arrow Articles by FRERICHS, R. R
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1995 Oxford University Press

research-article

Minimum Attack Rate for Measuring Measles Vaccine Efficacy

PARIVASH NOURJAH* and RALPH R FRERICHS{dagger},

* WESTAT 1650 Research Blvd, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
{dagger} Department of Epidemiology, University of California, Los Angeles, School of Public Health 10833 Le Conte Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1772, USA

Professor R R Frerichs.

BACKGROUND: For evaluating measles vaccine efficacy (VE) in the field, some investigators have suggested that an overall attack rate level of 5% or more in a randomly mixing population is sufficient to provide equal exposure to the viral agent in both vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. It is not clear, however, If this assumption is valid given the effect of herd immunity.

METHODS: We created a computer simulation model based on the stochastic extension of the Reed-Frost model and tested for variation in bias in VE estimation due to herd immunity, based on runs of 200 trials.

RESULTS: At higher levels of attack rate, the degree of herd immunity decreases, as does the percentage of trials with bias in VE estimation. The two main factors that affect the level of attack rate are the probability of adequate contact and the number of susceptibles. At a given level of attack rate, the number of susceptibles is positively associated with the percentage of biased trials in VE estimation. Since vaccination reduces the number of susceptibles, we also observe that when controlling for attack rate, higher vaccination coverage results in lower bias in VE estimation.

CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the assumption of no bias when the attack rate is 5% or more becomes Increasingly true when a large percentage of a randomly mixing population is immune.

Revised 1 September 1994


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am J EpidemiolHome page
S. S. Hutchins, A. Dezayas, K. L. Blond, J. Heath, W. Bellini, S. Audet, J. Beeler, W. Wattigney, and L. Markowitz
Evaluation of an Early Two-Dose Measles Vaccination Schedule
Am. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2001; 154(11): 1064 - 1071.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.