Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by NORMAN, S. A
Right arrow Articles by STOLLEY, P. D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by NORMAN, S. A
Right arrow Articles by STOLLEY, P. D
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1995 Oxford University Press

research-article

Cancer Incidence in a Group of Workers Potentially Exposed to Ethylene Oxide

SANDRA A NORMAN*, JESSE A BERLIN*, KEITH A SOPER*,**, BRUCE F MIDDENDORF{dagger} and PAUL D STOLLEY*,{ddagger}

* Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, 225L NEB/6095, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
** Present address: Merck Research Laboratories West Point, PA, USA
{dagger} Millard Fillmore Hospital, SUNY at Buffalo Affiliated Hospital Buffalo, NY, USA.
{ddagger} Present address: Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine Baltimore, MD, USA.

Background. Cytogenetic changes associated with ethylene oxide (ETO) exposure at a worksite prompted a study of cancer incidence in that cohort.

Method. Cancer incidence through 31 December 1987 was ascertained in a cohort of 1132 individuals employed at the worksite at any time from 1 July 1974 through 30 September 1980, the period of potential exposure to ETO at the plant. The number of observed cancers was compared with that expected based on age- and sex-specific incidence rates reported by the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Program. Standardized morbidity ratios (SMR) were calculated separately for regular and temporary employees.

Results. Of the 28 cancers observed in the cohort, 12 were breast cancers. The SMR for breast cancer among regular female employees ranged from 2.55 (95% Cl : 1.31–4.98, P = 0.02) to 1.70 (95% Cl . 0.89–3.23, P = 0.09) depending on calendar year of follow-up, assumptions about completeness of follow-up, and the reference rates used. The excess of breast cancer over expected in regular female employees diminished over time. No statistically significant excess of breast cancer was noted for temporary female employees at any point during follow-up. No increase in cancer incidence was found over that expected for any cancer sites associated with ETO in previous studies—leukaemia, brain, pancreas and stomach.

Conclusions. Factors such as appropriateness of latency periods, length of follow-up and lack of a common histopathological type need to be considered in evaluating the excesses in observed breast cancer incidence, which diminished over time.

Received 1 July 1994


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
D Coggon, E C Harris, J Poole, and K T Palmer
Mortality of workers exposed to ethylene oxide: extended follow up of a British cohort
Occup. Environ. Med., April 1, 2004; 61(4): 358 - 362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
K Steenland, L Stayner, and J Deddens
Mortality analyses in a cohort of 18 235 ethylene oxide exposed workers: follow up extended from 1987 to 1998
Occup. Environ. Med., January 1, 2004; 61(1): 2 - 7.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.