Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HAZEBROEK-KAMPSCHREUR, A. A J M
Right arrow Articles by VAN LINGE, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HAZEBROEK-KAMPSCHREUR, A. A J M
Right arrow Articles by VAN LINGE, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1994 Oxford University Press

other

Determinants of Trunk Abnormalities in Adolescence

ALICE A J M HAZEBROEK-KAMPSCHREUR*,**,{dagger}, ALBERT HOFMAN**, AD PH VAN DIJK* and BERT VAN LINGE{dagger}

* Department of Epidemiology, Municipal Health Service PO Box 70032, 3000 LP Rotterdam, The Netherlands
** Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Erasmus University Medical School Rotterdam, The Netherlands
{dagger} Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Rotterdam Rotterdam, The Netherlands

BACKGROUND: The relationship between gender, anthropometric factors, adolescent growth, maturation and incidence of trunk abnormalities was studied in 2819 children who were symmetric at baseline examination.

METHOD: At age 11 years and at age 13 years, data on height, weight, onset of adolescent growth spurt, pubertal phase and menarche were collected and examination for trunk abnormalities was performed. Data analysis included calculation of 2-year cumulative incidence and relative risks (RR) of trunk abnormalities.

RESULTS: Two-year cumulative incidence was 11%. The RR for boys was 0.78 (95% confidence interval (Cl): 0.63–0.96) compared to girls. Height was the strongest predictor for the development of trunk abnormalities in both sexes. The RR increased after adjustment for weight, onset of growth spurt, pubertal phase, and menarche. The RR was higher for girls with onset of adolescent growth spurt compared to girls who had not yet started their adolescent growth spurt (RR= 1.45, 95% Cl: 1.08–1.95). For girls who had reached menarche, the RR was 0.48 (95% Cl: 0.24–0.96) compared to those who had not reached menarche.

CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that taller 11 year old girls with onset of adolescent growth spurt have increased risk of future trunk abnormalities, but that having reached menarche has a protective effect.

Received 1 June 1994


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
S. L. S. Drop, W. J. de Waal, and S. M. P. F. de Muinck Keizer-Schrama
Sex Steroid Treatment of Constitutionally Tall Stature
Endocr. Rev., October 1, 1998; 19(5): 540 - 558.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.