Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HANSEN, J.
Right arrow Articles by LARSEN, A. I
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HANSEN, J.
Right arrow Articles by LARSEN, A. I
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1994 Oxford University Press

research-article

Cancer Morbidity among Employees in a Danish Pharmaceutical Plant

JOHNNI HANSEN*, JØRGEN H OLSEN* and ANDERS I LARSEN{dagger}

* Danish Cancer Society, Division for Cancer Epidemiology Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
{dagger} Novo Nordisk A/S, Occupational Health Service Novo Alle, DK-2880 Bagsværd Denmark

BACKGROUND: Workers in the pharmaceutical industry may be exposed to many potential carcinogens. We Investigated cancer morbidity in a Danish plant where enzymes, insulin, antibiotics and sex hormones were produced in substantial quantities.

METHODS: Altogether 10 889 people ever employed (1964–1988) at the pharmaceutical plant were retrieved from the files of a compulsory pension fund, and followed-up in the nationwide Danish Cancer Registry (1964–1989). Site-specific standardized incidence ratios (SIR) were estimated, based on cancer rates for the national population. Information on risk factors for breast cancer, e.g. number of children, age at menarche and first delivery, obesity, and non-occupational use of sex hormones was obtained from samples of the female employees, and compared to equivalent variables from the general population.

RESULTS: The overall SIR for women was significantly elevated (n = 5554; SIR = 1 2). Excess risk was particularly seen for breast cancer (n = 97; SIR = 1.5), especially in a subgroup who had started work at the factory aged 30–39 and had continued to work for –9 years (SIR = 2.8). The SIR was near unity for men (n = 5335); however, three men with breast cancer versus 0.4 expected were found. Lifestyle components explained only about one-quarter of the excess female breast cancers. Proxy measures of intensity of occupational exposure to sex hormones or insulin showed no association with the risk for breast cancer.

CONCLUSIONS: It seems unlikely that either a single occupational factor or an unusual reproductive pattern can explain the elevated breast cancer risk. Therefore, the finding requires further study.

Received 1 March 1994


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.