© 1994 Oxford University Press
other |
Intravenous Administration among Heroin Users Having Treatment in Spain

Delegación del Gobierno para el Plan Nacional sobre Drogas and Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Universidad de Granada
* Delegación del Gobierno para el Plan Nacional sobre Drogas, Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo, Paseo del Prado 1820, 28014 Madrid, Spain
Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Granada Granada, Spain
BackgroundOf critical importance to AIDS control in Spain is the analysis of geographical variation and trend over time in the prevalence of intravenous administration in heroin users, as well as the factors associated with the use of this route.
MethodsWe carried out a cross-sectional study of 27 655 people admitted to outpatient treatment for heroin dependence in 15 of the 17 Autonomous Communities of Spain during 1991, using data provided by the State Information System on Drug Abuse (SEIT). To assess the association of some factors with use of the intravenous route crude and logistic analysis was performed.
ResultsThe prevalence of intravenous administration in this population was 64.4% with regional differences ranging between 33% and 90%. Crude and lcgistic analysis demonstrated a strong association with two factors in addition to geography: the year of first use and the age at first use (the earlier the first use, the greater the strength of the association).
ConclusionsThese findings are of paramount importance for the control of the HIV epidemic in Spain and further study in this area could help to guide policy development.
Received 1 January 1994
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. de la Fuente, M. J. Bravo, C. Toro, M T. Brugal, G. Barrio, V. Soriano, F. Vallejo, R. Ballesta, and Project Itinere Group Injecting and HIV prevalence among young heroin users in three Spanish cities and their association with the delayed implementation of harm reduction programmes. J Epidemiol Community Health, June 1, 2006; 60(6): 537 - 542. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
