Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by TÜCHSEN, F.
Right arrow Articles by BACH, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by TÜCHSEN, F.
Right arrow Articles by BACH, E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1994 Oxford University Press

other

Employment Status, Non-Daytime Work and Gastric Ulcer In Men

FINN TÜCHSEN*, JEPPE JEPPESEN{dagger} and ELSA BACH*

* National Institute of Occupational Health Lersĝ Parkallé105, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ĝ, Denmark
{dagger} Department of Occupational Medicine, Aalborg regional Hospital Denmark

BACKGROUND: An excess risk of gastric ulcer (GU) (ICD-8: 531) has formerly been found in shift workers and ex-shiftworkers but littie is known about the risk of GU associated with other forms of non-daytime work. This study deals with associations between non-daytime work and GU.

METHODS: A fixed cohort of 122 116 men in occupations in which at least 20% had non-daytime work and a reference group of 593 281 men in occupations with daytime work only, was followed in the National inpatient Register for first discharges with GU as the principal diagnosis.

RESULTS: For men with daytime work only we found a steep inverse association between GU and employment status. Men in occupational groups with late evening work had a standardized hospitalization ratio (SHR) of 236 (90% confidence interval [CI]: 184–299), groups working in rosters covering 24-hour services had an SHR of 147 (90% CI: 116–183). A slightly raised risk of 114 (90% CI: 101–128) was found in groups having other forms of non-daytime work. For all men in groups with non-daytime work we found a significant SHR of 130 (90% CI: 1187–142).

CONCLUSION: We condude that both low employment status and non-daytime work are associated with an increased risk of GU.

Received 1 August 1993


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. Axelsson, T. Akerstedt, G. Kecklund, A. Lindqvist, and R. Attefors
Hormonal changes in satisfied and dissatisfied shift workers across a shift cycle
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2003; 95(5): 2099 - 2105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
N W H Jansen, L G P M van Amelsvoort, T S Kristensen, P A van den Brandt, and I. Kant
Work schedules and fatigue: a prospective cohort study
Occup. Environ. Med., June 1, 2003; 60(90001): i47 - 53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.