© 1994 Oxford University Press
other |
Validation of Self-Reported Neurological Disability in Multiple Sclerosis
;
*INSERM U 360: Recherches épidéminologiques en neurologie et psychopathologic 16 Avenue P Vaillant-Couturier, 94807 Villejuif, Cedex France
**Service de neurologie, Hôpital St Antoine, Paris, France
Département de neuro-sciences CHU Henri Mondor, Créceil, France
Verdier-Taillefer M-H (INSERM U 360, Recherches épidémiologiques en neurologie et psychopathologie, 16 Avenue P Vaillant-Couturier, 94807 Villejuif Cedex France), Roullet E, Cesaro P and Alpérovitch A. Validation of self-reported disability in multiple sclerosis. International Journal of Epidemiology 1994; 23: 148154.
In all 129 unselected patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) completed a 25 item auto-questionnaire for assessment of disability. Each patient was examined on the same day by a neurologist who was blind to patients' answers and gave Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores. From the auto-questionnaire, eight scores were obtained, one for each of the seven functional systems rated by the EDSS and the eighth relating to walking difficulties. Analysis showed that correlation between patients' self assessments and the neurologist's ratings was high (r>0.50) for five out of the eight scores and low for three, especially for brainstem and mental functions which were excluded from subsequent analysis. Using a linear regression model, it was possible to predict the EDSS scores given by the neurologist (±1 point) from patients' answers in 73% of the cases. The performance of the model was robust and was not influenced by patients' characteristics (sex, age, disease course). This study shows that most aspects of MS disability can be self-assessed by patients, and suggest a useful approach when it is not feasible to examine each MS patient as in large community-based studies. Collaborative studies for defining and validating auto-questionnaires on disability should be encouraged.
Received 1 July 1993
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R.A. Marrie and M. Goldman Validity of performance scales for disability assessment in multiple sclerosis Multiple Sclerosis, November 1, 2007; 13(9): 1176 - 1182. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Mohr, S. L. Hart, L. Julian, C. Catledge, L. Honos-Webb, L. Vella, and E. T. Tasch Telephone-Administered Psychotherapy for Depression Arch Gen Psychiatry, September 1, 2005; 62(9): 1007 - 1014. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. D. Ackerman, R. Heyman, B. S. Rabin, B. P. Anderson, P. R. Houck, E. Frank, and A. Baum Stressful Life Events Precede Exacerbations of Multiple Sclerosis Psychosom Med, November 1, 2002; 64(6): 916 - 920. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W. Nortvedt, T. Riise, K.-M. Myhr, and H. I. Nyland Quality of life in multiple sclerosis: Measuring the disease effects more broadly Neurology, September 1, 1999; 53(5): 1098 - 1098. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Quick and R. T. Schapiro Population Dynamics of the Disability Status Scales for Multiple Sclerosis Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 1996; 10(2): 127 - 134. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||




