Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lagorio, S.
Right arrow Articles by Carere, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lagorio, S.
Right arrow Articles by Carere, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

International Journal of Epidemiology, Vol 22, S51-S56, Copyright © 1993 by International Epidemiological Association

ARTICLES

Exposure assessment in a historical cohort of filling station attendants

S Lagorio, F Forastiere, I Iavarone, N Vanacore, S Fuselli and A Carere
Istituto Superiore di Sanita, Laboratorio Igiene Ambientale, Rome, Italy.

A historical cohort of service station attendants is underway. It is aimed at evaluating possible excess cancer risk in relation to exposure intensity. In this paper we discuss the feasibility of a retrospective exposure assessment by evaluating the association between indicators of workload and the exposure intensity to some aromatic hydrocarbons measured in a sample of current employees. Available for the analysis were 703 personal samples from 111 filling station workers. Measured concentrations of benzene, toluene and xylenes (8-hour time weighted averages) averaged 0.55 mg/m3, 0.71 mg/m3 and 0.32 mg/m3, respectively. The number of vehicles filled, the daily sales of super premium gasoline and motorbike fuel, and the winter season were all significant predictors of the log concentration of benzene in simple regression analyses. The size of the station acted as an effect modifier. While no single variable was able to predict the benzene level in large stations, for small stations an increase of 0.0579 and of 0.0418 in the log benzene concentration per unit increase in super premium gasoline (100 I) and in motorbike fuel (10 I) dispensed, was estimated. The overall variance explained by the multivariate model, however, was only 12.3%. Therefore, a clear categorization of groups with homogeneous and significantly different exposure levels is not achievable. From the point of view of exposure assessment, workers in small stations with higher sales of super premium gasoline tend to have higher exposure levels. This group should be examined in detail when the final results of the cohort study are available.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.