Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FORSBERG, B. C
Right arrow Articles by NAGELKERKE, N. J D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by FORSBERG, B. C
Right arrow Articles by NAGELKERKE, N. J D
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1993 Oxford University Press

other

Cross-Sectional Household Surveys of Diarrhoeal Diseases— A Comparison of Data from the Control of Diarrhoeal Diseases and Demographic and Health Surveys Programmes

BIRGER C FORSBERG*, JEROEN K VAN GINNEKEN** and NICO J D NAGELKERKE{dagger}

* Karolinska Institute, Department of Social Medicine, and International Health S-172 83 Sundbyberg, Sweden
** Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute The Hague, The Netherlands
{dagger} Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Nairobi Kenya and University of Manitoba Canada

Cross-sectional household surveys are extensively used for data collection, priority setting and programme evaluation in developing countries. They are now being promoted to assess a number of health care interventions such as Control of Diarrhoeal Diseases (CDD), Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI), AIDS control and child survival programmes. Few field studies of the validity and precision of data generated from these surveys have been carried out, in part because such work is rather demanding of resources. The purpose of this study was to draw conclusions on validity and reliability of data from household surveys through a comparison of results from large-scale surveys on diarrhoea conducted by CDD and Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) programmes in developing countries. Diarrhoea prevalence and treatment were compared for nine surveys for which little time had passed in between the CDD and DHS survey. The variation in results between the surveys was in many instances too large to be explained only by a true variation in the variable studied. A literature review suggested that validity problems could be due to response and recall errors. The authors caution the use of frequent household surveys for programme impact evaluation. Their cost-effectiveness should be carefully assessed, especially when services' evaluations already have provided evidence that a programme has had a positive effect on the behaviour of health workers and target groups in the community. It is recommended that more research be carried out on how selection and training of surveyors can be improved to make the quality of household surveys in developing countries better.

Received 1 June 1993


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Int J EpidemiolHome page
A. O. Manesh, T. A Sheldon, K. E Pickett, and R. Carr-Hill
Accuracy of child morbidity data in demographic and health surveys
Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2008; 37(1): 194 - 200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.