Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SUTTER, R. W
Right arrow Articles by EL-BUALY, M. S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SUTTER, R. W
Right arrow Articles by EL-BUALY, M. S
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1993 Oxford University Press

other

Paralytic Poliomyelitis in Oman: Association between Regional Differences in Attack Rate and Variations in Antibody Responses to Oral Poliovirus Vaccine

ROLAND W SUTTER*, PETER A PATRIARCA*, ALI JAFFER M SULEIMAN**, MARK A PALLANSCH{dagger}, ELIZABETH R ZELL*, PRADEEP G MALANKAR**, SHAUN BROGAN**, AHMED A K AL-GHASSANI** and MUSALLAM S EL-BUALY**

* Division of Immunization (EO5) Atlanta, GA 30333, USA
** Ministry of Health Muscat, Oman
{dagger} Division of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases, Centers for Disease Control Atlanta, GA 30333, USA

Reprint requests to: Information Services, National Center for Prevention Services (EO7), Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA

Variation in attack rates of paralytic disease by region during the 1988–1989 epidemic of type 1 poliomyelitis in Oman provided the stimulus to test the hypothesis that these observations were due to regional differences in the response of infants to trivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV). Seroprevalence studies of 394 children born during the outbreak were conducted in six different regions of Oman and in two socioeconomic status (SES) groups in the capital city of Muscat; a seroconversion study was also carried out in 105 infants born after the outbreak. Seroprevalence rates by region after receipt of at least three doses of OPV ranged from 90% to 100% (median 94%) to poliovirus type 1, and from 86% to 100% (median 97%) to type 2, and from 47% to 79% [median 72%) to type 3, with the lowest rates observed in regions with the highest incidence of type 1 paralytic disease. In Muscat, seroprevalence rates were also significantly lower in low versus high SES groups (type 1: 84% versus 98%. respectively [P = 0.006]; type 3: 59% versus 86%. respectively [P = 0.001]). In the seroconversion study conducted after the outbreak, 89%. 100% and 50% of infants had detectable antibodies to types 1, 2, and 3, respectively, after four doses of OPV. Low responses to type 3 were also associated with the occurrence of sporadic cases of type 3 poliomyelitis in 1991, in spite of high rates of coverage with at least four doses of OPV (>96%) throughout the country. These findings demonstrate that antibody responses to OPV may vary widely within individual countries, and that a uniform strategy to deliver at least three doses in routine programmes may be insufficient to achieve elimination of wild poliovirus infection.

Received 1 March 1993


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
R. W. Sutter, A. J. M. Suleiman, P. Malankar, S. Al-Khusaiby, F. Mehta, G. B. Clements, M. A. Pallansch, and S. E. Robertson
Trial of a Supplemental Dose of Four Poliovirus Vaccines
N. Engl. J. Med., September 14, 2000; 343(11): 767 - 773.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
M. Divizia, L. Palombi, E. Buonomo, D. Donia, V. Ruscio, M. Equestre, L. Leno, A. Panà, and A. M. Degener
Genomic Characterization of Human and Environmental Polioviruses Isolated in Albania
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., August 1, 1999; 65(8): 3534 - 3539.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.