Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MAGGWA, B. N
Right arrow Articles by HUNTER, D. J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MAGGWA, B. N
Right arrow Articles by HUNTER, D. J
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1993 Oxford University Press

other

Validity of Contraceptive Histories in a Rural Community in Kenya

BAKER N MAGGWA*, JAPHETH K MATI*,, SUSAN MBUGUA* and DAVID J HUNTER{dagger}

* Department of Obstccrics and Gynecology, University of Nairobi Kenya
{dagger} Deparmemt of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston MA, USA

Reprint requests to: J K Mati. Rockefeller Foundation, PO Box 47543, Nairobi, Kenya

To determine the validity of self-reported contraceptive histories obtained from rural Kenyan women, we interviewed 122 women participants in a long-term study during which their contraceptive use had been recorded regularty at clinics. Interview information wascompared with each woman's clinic record. In all 71 women (58%) reported ever use of oral contraceptives, while 76 (62%) of the clinic records documented ever use. The agreement between the records and interview was reasonable (Kappa=0.54, P<0.001). The sensitivity of self-report of use compared to clinic records was 79%, specificity was 76%, positive and negative predictive values were 85% and 69% respectively. Ever use of injectable contraceptives (Depo-Provera) was reported by 78 (63%) women while the records showed use by 80 (a%) women (Kappa=0.87, P<0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 94%, 93%, 96%, and 89% respectively. For the intrauterine contraceptive device, ever use was reported by 18 (14.8%) women while the records showed 19 (15.6%) (Kappa=0.90, P<0.001). The associated sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 90%. 99%, 94%, and 98% respectively. The validity of reported duration of use of each method showed a similar pattern to that of the history of ever use. The Spearman's rank correlations for the duration of use calculated from interview compared with the clinic records were for oral contraceptives r=0.68 (P<0.001), injectables r=0.81 (P<0.001) and intrauterine devices r=0.81 (P<0.001). We conclude that contraceptive histories obtained using this approach were reasonably valid, with methds involving clinic procedures such as injectables and intrauterine devices having the highest validity.

Revised 1 January 1993


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 IOVSHome page
J. J. Nichols, G. L. Mitchell, and K. K. Nichols
An Assessment of Self-Reported Disease Classification in Epidemiological Studies of Dry Eye
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2004; 45(10): 3453 - 3457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.