Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ENGEL, R. R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ENGEL, R. R
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1993 Oxford University Press

other

Evaluating Modifications in Epidemic Surveillance Systems: A Method and an Application to AIDS Surveillance in Switzerland

ROBERT R ENGEL

Epidemiology Program, School of Public Health, Department of Biomedical and Environmental Health Sciences, 140 Warren Hall, University of California at Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720, USA

A method is presented for evaluating the impact of a modification in a surveillance system for an epidemic disease among reporting sources susceptible to the modification. The approach requires a control series with reports from sources that are not affected by the modification. The measure of effect is the reporting odds ratio (ROR) which estimates the ratio of reporting proportions (completeness) before and after the change. The proportions themselves remain unknown. Various potential biases are identified and an investigation of one potential bias is proposed. The method may prove useful in supplementing techniques that estimate absolute values of completeness of registry systems. The application to AIDS surveillance data in Switzerland shows that the transition from voluntary to mandatory reporting had an impact that was enhanced by the 1987 revision of the Centers for Disease Control case definition for AIDS. Reporting sources were 1.9 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4–2.6) times more likely to report their patients after introduction of mandatory reporting. It is estimated that 15% of all reports were attributable to mandatory reporting.

Received 1 September 1992


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.