© 1993 Oxford University Press
other |
Prevalence of Hand Dermatitis in Different Occupations
*National Institute of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology P0 Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands
**Institute of Occupational Health, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Occupautional Dermatology Unit, Groningen University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands
The prevalence of hand dermatitis in different occupational groups was estimated using a standardized questionnaire in a series of surveys among workers of a chemical company, a municipal electricity company, municipal public works, nurses and surgical assistants. A survey in a sample of the general population was performed to obtain a reference estimate of the prevalence. The prevalence of hand dermatitis in the general population was 5.2% in men and 10.6% in women. The prevalence of hand dermatitis among the occupational groups ranged from 2.9% in office workers to ap proximately 30% in nurses. The age-adjusted prevalence ratio (PR) of hand dermatitis in office workers was not significantly elevated compared with the general population. In nurses, the age-adjusted PR was 9.3 among men (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.6–23.9) and 2.2 among women (95% CI: 1.5–3.5). The PR in surgical assistants was not significantly elevated (PR=1.4, 95% CI: 0.7–2.6). This suggests that exposure in nurses (frequent washing of the hands), is more harmful to the skin than the less frequent but more intensive exposure in surgical assistants. The age-adjusted PR ware also significantly elevated in male manual workers of the chemical company, the electricity company and public works and varied from 2.4 to 2.8. Occasional or regular occupational exposure to a variety of irritants in combination with mechanical stress (as occurs frequently in manual work) may be responsible for this observation. It is con cluded that nurses (heavy exposure) as well as manual workers (low to moderate exposure to irritants in combination with mechanical stress) have an elevated prevalence of hand dermatitis in comparison with the general population, whereas the prevalence in office workers (no exposure) is comparable to that of the general population. To put the findings into perspective, it is noted that the symptoms probably are relatively mild in the majority of cases, judged from the proportion of cases that resulted in sick leave (3–9%) and the proportion of cases that required medical attention (15–30%).
Received 1 September 1992
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  B. P. McCall, I. B. Horwitz, S. R. Feldman, and R. Balkrishnan Incidence Rates, Costs, Severity, and Work-Related Factors of Occupational Dermatitis: A Workers' Compensation Analysis of Oregon, 1990-1997 Arch Dermatol, June 1, 2005; 141(6): 713 - 718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Ruzicka, F. G. Larsen, D. Galewicz, A. Horvath, P. J. Coenraads, K. Thestrup-Pedersen, J. P. Ortonne, C. C. Zouboulis, M. Harsch, T. C. Brown, et al. Oral Alitretinoin (9-cis-Retinoic Acid) Therapy for Chronic Hand Dermatitis in Patients Refractory to Standard Therapy: Results of a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Trial Arch Dermatol, December 1, 2004; 140(12): 1453 - 1459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. H. Crawford, K. A. Katz, E. Ellis, and W. D. James Use of Aromatherapy Products and Increased Risk of Hand Dermatitis in Massage Therapists Arch Dermatol, August 1, 2004; 140(8): 991 - 996. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|