Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KÄLLÉN, B.
Right arrow Articles by ROBERT, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by KÄLLÉN, B.
Right arrow Articles by ROBERT, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1993 Oxford University Press

other

Monitoring Dominant Germ Cell Mutations Using Skeletal Dysplasias Registered in Malformation Registries: An International Feasibility Study

BENGT KÄLLÉN*, LISBETH B KNUDSEN**, OSVALDO MUTCHINICK{dagger}, PIERPAOLO MASTROIACOVO{ddagger}, PAUL LANCASTER§, EDUARDO CASTILLA and ELISABETH ROBERT

*Department of Embryology, University of Lund Biskopsgaten 7, S-223 62 Lund, Sweden
**National Board of Health Copenhagen, Denmark
{dagger}RYVEMCE, Departmento de Genética, instituto Nacional de Nutrición Salvador Zubiran Mexico DF, Mexico
{ddagger}IPIMC, Servizio Epidemiologia e Clinica Difetti Congeniti, Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli Rome, Italy
§AIH National Perinatal Statistics Unit, University of Sydney Sydney, Australia
||ECLAMC/Genetica/Fiocruz Rio de Janerio, Brazil and CEMIC Buenos Aires, Argentina
Institut Européen des Génomutations Lyon, France

Using data from seven malformation monitoring systems around the world, the feasibility of monitoring fresh dominant mutations using skeletal dysplasias was explored. Based on a total of over 9.5 million births, 1500 infants with skeletal dysplasias were identified (16 per 100000). In spite of efforts to get exact diagnoses, an average of 21% were unspecified. Comparisons of rates of specific diagnoses in different programmes suggested that classification differed. By analysing maternal age distribution, estimates were made of the proportion of fresh mutations in different subgroups: conditions regarded as dominant (achondroplasia, thanatophoric dysplasia, spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia) were estimated to consist of 58% fresh mutations-some of the remaining cases were inherited, others were probably misclassified. Among conditions regarded as recessive, only 5% were estimated to be truly dominant mutations. In the total group of skeletal dysplasias, 21% were estimated to be fresh dominant mutations and if osteogenesis imperfecta were excluded, the figure was 31%. By power analyses it was shown that equal monitoring power may be obtained by a programme covering about 45 000 births per year with intensive diagnosis of each individual case of skeletal dysplasia and a programme some three times greater where no specific diagnoses are obtained. An increasing trend in the occurrence of skeletal dysplasias was seen but probably explained by changing ascertainment. An impact of antenatal diagnosis resulting in a decrease in occurrence was also apparent in some programmes.

Received 1 July 1992


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.