Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MARKKU, S.
Right arrow Articles by GRANFORS, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MARKKU, S.
Right arrow Articles by GRANFORS, K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1992 Oxford University Press

other

A Method to Compare Exposed Populations in Seroepidemiology

SEURI MARKKU* and KAISA GRANFORS{dagger}

*Department of Community Health and General Practice, University of Kuopio PO Box 1627, SF–70211 Kuopio, Finland
{dagger}National Public Health Institute, University of Turku Finland

In seroepidemiology when a single sample is taken from exposed and non-exposed subjects, the results of serological tests are usually reduced to a dichotomy: normal (low or no antibodies) or elevated (high or antibodies found). The choice of the cutoff point between these values has been based on various vaguely defined methods and the results depend, at least partly, on the method chosen. An alternative method is introduced here which is not based on the absolute value of a serological test but on the rank order of the values of the test. In this ordered series the risk ratio (RR) and the upper and lower confidence limits (CL) are plotted for each exposed subject as the cutoff value is moved from the highest value to the lowest one. The method is applicable in quantitative immunoassays. If a priori defined RR and confidence limit or limits are reached at any point of the plot, the data support the original hypothesis. The advantage of this alternative method is that no single cutoff value is needed.

Revised 1 June 1992


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.