Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (39)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HERRERO, R.
Right arrow Articles by TENORIO, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HERRERO, R.
Right arrow Articles by TENORIO, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1992 Oxford University Press

other

Screening for Cervical Cancer in Latin America: A Case-Control Study

ROLANDO HERRERO*,**, LOUISE A BRINTON**,, WILLIAM C REEVES{dagger},{ddagger}, MARIA M BRENES{dagger}, ROSA C DE BRITTON§, EDUARDO GAITAN|| and FRANCISCO TENORIO

*Unidad Nacional de Cancerologia, Caja Costarricense de Seguro Social PO Box 1287-1250, San Jose, Costa Rica
**Environmental Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
{dagger}Gorgas Memorial Laboratory Panama City, Republic of Panama
§Instituto Oncologico Nacional, Panama Republics de Panama
||Division de Epidemiologia, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia Bogota, Colombia
Hospital de Oncologia Nacional, Instituto Mexicano de Seguridad Social Mexico City, Mexico

Reprint requests: Dr Louise A Brinton, Environmental Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Executive Plaza North, Room 443, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA

The beneficial effect of cervical cytology in reducing the incidence of invasive cervical cancer is well accepted, but many issues regarding specific patterns of screening remain to be resolved, and preventive programmes need to be adapted to regional characteristics. In a case-control study conducted in Latin America, we investigated cytological screening histories of 759 cases of invasive cervical cancer and 1430 controls, with participation rates of 99% and 96%, respectively. Fifty per cent of the cases and 29% of the controls reported never having been screened. Screening was less common among older, less educated and less parous women; non-users of oral contraceptives and women without histories of venereal diseases. There was also evidence that older women and those with multiple partners had longer intervals between examinations. The relative risk (RR) associated with no prior screening was approximately 3 and was not modified by other risk factors. Women reporting a Pap smear within 24–47 months before interview had the same RR as those examined within 12–23 months. Women tested longer ago had higher risks, but still much lower than women never examined. There was evidence that one examination is associated with less reduction in risk than two, regardless of the interval since last Pap smear. Screening appeared to reduce risk of both squamous cell carcinomas and adenocarcinornas. As expected, cases presenting at advanced stages were less likely to have been screened and reported longer intervals since their last examination. These results support the need to concentrate limited resources in the groups that need screening most, mainly older and less educated women who have never been screened.

Revised 1 June 1992


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
V. A Paz Soldan, F. H Lee, C. Carcamo, K. K Holmes, G. P Garnett, and P. Garcia
Who is getting Pap smears in urban Peru?
Int. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2008; 37(4): 862 - 869.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Public HealthHome page
J. Spayne, I. Ackerman, M. Milosevic, A. Seidenfeld, A. Covens, and L. Paszat
Invasive cervical cancer: a failure of screening
Eur J Public Health, April 1, 2008; 18(2): 162 - 165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
K. Aklimunnessa, M. Mori, M. M. H. Khan, F. Sakauchi, T. Kubo, Y. Fujino, S. Suzuki, S. Tokudome, A. Tamakoshi, and for the JACC Study Group
Effectiveness of Cervical Cancer Screening Over Cervical Cancer Mortality Among Japanese Women
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., August 1, 2006; 36(8): 511 - 518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
M Hoffman, D Cooper, H Carrara, L Rosenberg, J Kelly, I Stander, A-L Williamson, L Denny, G du Toit, and S Shapiro
Limited Pap screening associated with reduced risk of cervical cancer in South Africa
Int. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2003; 32(4): 573 - 577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
M. G. Miller, H.-Y. Sung, G. F. Sawaya, K. A. Kearney, W. Kinney, and R. A. Hiatt
Screening Interval and Risk of Invasive Squamous Cell Cervical Cancer
Obstet. Gynecol., January 1, 2003; 101(1): 29 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
A. Ferrera, J. P Velema, M. Figueroa, R. Bulnes, L. A Toro, J. M Claros, O. de Barahona, and W. J. Melchers
Co-factors related to the causal relationship between human papillomavirus and invasive cervical cancer in Honduras
Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2000; 29(5): 817 - 825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. V. Lacey Jr., L. A. Brinton, F. M. Abbas, W. A. Barnes, P. E. Gravitt, M. D. Greenberg, S. M. Greene, O. C. Hadjimichael, L. McGowan, R. Mortel, et al.
Oral Contraceptives as Risk Factors for Cervical Adenocarcinomas and Squamous Cell Carcinomas
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 1999; 8(12): 1079 - 1085.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.