© 1991 Oxford University Press
research-article |
Determinants of Traffic Accident Mortality in the Netherlands: A Geographical Analysis
Department of Public Health and Social Medicine, Erasmus University Rotterdam PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
In the Netherlands, a country with one of the lowest levels of traffic accident mortality in the world, large regional mortality differences can be observed. An analysis was performed of the contribution of regional differences in traffic mobility (kilometres travelled/person-years), injury rate (injured people/kilometre travelled) and case fatality (traffic deaths/injured people). Subsequently, possible determinants of regional differences in traffic accident mortality and its constituent parts were investigated. Both the influence of sociodemographic factors and of factors probably more directly related to traffic deaths (road infrastructure, medical care) was studied.
Regional differences in traffic accident mortality in the Netherlands can only to a very limited extent be explained by regional differences in traffic mobility. Regional differences in case fatality seem to make the most important contribution.
Of the sociodemographic factors that were used in the analysis, per capita income appears to be the strongest predictor of regional mortality differences. A higher income level is associated with lower mortality levels.
Of the factors more directly related to traffic deaths, traffic density and the availability of advanced trauma care (neu-rosurgery and computerized tomography (CT-Scan)) in the region are the most important predictors of regional mortality differences. Both variables show an inverse relationship with case fatality. Probably a higher traffic density leads to a shift towards less severe injuries. The availability of advanced trauma care could be important in early diagnosis and treatment of head injuries.
The results of this study, based on existing data sources, must be interpreted with care. Some potential sources of bias (omitted variables, regional differences in accident reporting) are discussed.
Revised 1 November 1990
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  I Stirbu, A E Kunst, V Bos, and E F van Beeck Injury mortality among ethnic minority groups in the Netherlands. J. Epidemiol. Community Health, March 1, 2006; 60(3): 249 - 255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. Fukuda, K. Nakamura, and T. Takano Cause-specific mortality differences across socioeconomic position of municipalities in Japan, 1973-1977 and 1993-1998: increased importance of injury and suicide in inequality for ages under 75 Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2005; 34(1): 100 - 109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Hasselberg, L Laflamme, and G Ringback Weitoft Socioeconomic differences in road traffic injuries during childhood and youth: a closer look at different kinds of road user J. Epidemiol. Community Health, December 1, 2001; 55(12): 858 - 862. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E D Richter, P Barach, E Ben-Michael, and T Berman Death and injury from motor vehicle crashes: a public health failure, not an achievement Inj. Prev., September 1, 2001; 7(3): 176 - 178. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L Laflamme and F Diderichsen Social differences in traffic injury risks in childhood and youth--a literature review and a research agenda Inj. Prev., December 1, 2000; 6(4): 293 - 298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. F van Beeck, G. J. Borsboom, and J. P Mackenbach Economic development and traffic accident mortality in the industrialized world, 1962-1990 Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2000; 29(3): 503 - 509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. VAN DE VATHORST and C. ALVAREZ-DARDET Doctors as judges: the verdict on responsibility for health J. Epidemiol. Community Health, March 1, 2000; 54(3): 162 - 164. [Full Text]
|
|