Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HAMMAR, N.
Right arrow Articles by NORELL, S. E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HAMMAR, N.
Right arrow Articles by NORELL, S. E
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1991 Oxford University Press

research-article

Retrospective versus Original Information on Diet among Cases of Colorectal Cancer and Controls

NIKLAS HAMMAR and STAFFAN E NORELL

Department of Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet Box 60208, S-10401, Stockholm, Sweden.

A cohort of subjects born 1908 to 1925 answered a questionnaire on dietary habits in 1967 (original information). Of the cases of colorectal cancer that were diagnosed in this cohort 1968–1983, 50 were still alive in 1987. A total of 150 controls were selected as a stratified (age, sex) random sample of those who did not have a colorectal cancer. In 1987, the cases and controls were asked to fill in a questionnaire on dietary habits in 1967 (retrospective information) as well as on their current dietary habits. The questions were identical and used to compare retrospective and original information on diet among cases and controls, taking into account any changes in dietary habits during the intervening period.

Cases and controls usually had a similar tendency to overestimate or underestimate their previous food intake. For both cases and controls, the tendency to overestimate previous intake was closely related to an increase in consumption during the intervening period and vice versa. Among those subjects who had not altered their consumption during the intervening period, there was usually a rather good agreement between the retrospective and original information. This was true for the cases as well as for the controls. For certain food items, the results suggest that the use of retrospective information would introduce a differential misclassification. In order to avoid or reduce a differential misclassification introduced by differencs between cases and controls in changes in consumption due to the disease under study, it may be advisable to interview the cases as soon as possible after diagnosis or even at the time of a preliminary diagnosis.

Revised 1 March 1991


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
F. Nyberg, S.-M. Hou, G. Pershagen, and B. Lambert
Dietary fruit and vegetables protect against somatic mutation in vivo, but low or high intake of carotenoids does not
Carcinogenesis, April 1, 2003; 24(4): 689 - 696.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
E. Vingard, L. Alfredsson, and H. Malchau
Osteoarthrosis of the Hip in Women and Its Relationship to Physical Load from Sports Activities
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 1998; 26(1): 78 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Rheum DisHome page
E. Vingård, L. Alfredsson, and H. Malchau
Osteoarthrosis of the hip in women and its relation to physical load at work and in the home
Ann Rheum Dis, May 1, 1997; 56(5): 293 - 298.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
G. R. Bunin, R. R. Kuijten, J. D. Buckley, L. B. Rorke, and A. T. Meadows
Relation between Maternal Diet and Subsequent Primitive Neuroectodermal Brain Tumors in Young Children
N. Engl. J. Med., August 19, 1993; 329(8): 536 - 541.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.