Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KILLEWO, J.
Right arrow Articles by MPEMBENI, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by KILLEWO, J.
Right arrow Articles by MPEMBENI, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1991 Oxford University Press

research-article

The Protective Effect of Measles Vaccine under Routine Vaccination Conditions in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania: A Case-Control Study

JAPHET KILLEWO*, CYPRIAN MAKWAYA*, EMMANUEL MUNUBHI** and ROSE MPEMBENI*

*Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Medicine PO Box 65015, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
**Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Medicine PO Box 65015, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

A total of 172 cases of measles were obtained over two six-week periods from hospitals likely to admit such cases in the city and their mothers interviewed using a questionnaire that had been developed fror the purpose. In addition, each case was matched to four controls for age, sex and place of residence and their mothers were also interviewed using the same questionnaire as for the cases. Vaccination status of the cases and the controls was ascertained by asking the mothers as well as obtaining vaccination information from the Mother-and-Child or Road-to Health (MCH) clinic cards normally issued to mothers at first vaccination of their children.

The overall protective effect of measles vaccine in all age groups studied was found to be 54% (95% confidence limits (CL) 36%–67%) when mothers' recall for vaccination status was used. This level of protection was considered to be low compared with the efficacy of the vaccine under experimental conditions in controlled trials previously reported. However when MCH Clinic cards were used to ascertain vaccination status the protective effect rose to as high as 96% (95% CL 83%–99%).

Potential biases in the study design and their role in masking or exaggerating the vaccine efficacy are discussed. It was therefore concluded that the protective effect of measles vaccine under routine vaccination conditions prevailing in Dar es Salaam region at the time of this study was as high as observed under experimental conditions when ascertainment of vaccination status was record-based. The study therefore recommended that, whenever in doubt about vaccine efficacy, simple study designs like the case-control method should be used to quickly evaluate vaccine efficacy by utilizing record-based vaccination status ascertainment methods.

Revised 1 January 1991


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.