Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PARAZZINI, F.
Right arrow Articles by DECARLI, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by PARAZZINI, F.
Right arrow Articles by DECARLI, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1991 Oxford University Press

research-article

Smoking Habits and Risk of Benign Breast Disease

FABIO PARAZZINI*, MONICA FERRARONI**, CARLO LA VECCHIA*,{dagger}, JOHN A BARON{ddagger}, FABIO LEVI{dagger}, SILVIA FRANCESCHI§ and ADRIANO DECARLI**

*Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche ‘Mario Negn’ Via Eritrea 62, 20157 Milan, Italy.
**Istituto di Biometria e Statistica Medica, University of Milan 20133 Milan, Italy.
{dagger}Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Lausanne 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland.
{ddagger}Department of Community and Family Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School 03756 Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
§Oncological Referral Centre 33081 Aviano, Pordenone, Italy.

The relationship between smoking habits and the risk of benign breast disease (BBD) was analyzed using data from a case-control study conducted between 1981 and 1983 in the greater Milan area, Northern Italy. Cases (n = 288) were women with histologically confirmed BBD (203 dysplasia, 85 benign tumours) referred to the National Cancer Institute of Milan for biopsies. Controls were women (n = 291) seen on selected days for a cytological smear for cervical cancer in outpatient clinics of the same Institute. No consistent association emerged between various indicators of smoking habits (smoking status, number of cigarettes smoked per day, duration of smoking) and the risk of BBD. Compared with never smokers the relative risk (RR) of all BBD combined was 0.7 (95% confidence interval, Cl: 0.4–1.3) in exsmokers, 1.4 (95% Cl: 0.8–2.5) in smokers of less than 10 cigarettes per day, and 1.1 (95% Cl: 0.7–1.7) in smokers of 10 or more cigarettes per day. There was some suggestion that the risk may be below unity post-menopause, but the relative risks for smokers were not statistically different in pre- (RR = 1.2; 95% Cl: 0.8–1.8) and post-menopausal (RR = 0.6; 95% Cl: 0.2–1.7) women. The risk of benign tumours (chiefly fibradenoma) was higher in current smokers, but this finding was not statistically significant (RR = 1.5; 95% Cl: 0.9–2.6) and the highest risks were observed in the strata of lighter smokers and those with shorter duration of smoking. Overall these results fail to support a negative association between smoking habits and benign breast disease.

Revised 1 November 1990


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
P. D. Terry and T. E. Rohan
Cigarette Smoking and the Risk of Breast Cancer in Women: A Review of the Literature
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2002; 11(10): 953 - 971.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
Z. Coriaty Nelson, R. M. Ray, D. L. Gao, and D. B. Thomas
Risk Factors for Fibroadenoma in a Cohort of Female Textile Workers in Shanghai, China
Am. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2002; 156(7): 599 - 605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
C. Friedenreich, H. Bryant, F Alexander, J Hugh, J Danyluk, and D. Page
Risk factors for benign proliferative breast disease
Int. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2000; 29(4): 637 - 644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.