Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WOODWARD, M.
Right arrow Articles by TUNSTALL-PEDOE, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by WOODWARD, M.
Right arrow Articles by TUNSTALL-PEDOE, H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1991 Oxford University Press

research-article

Bias from Missing Values: Sex Differences in Implication of Failed Venepuncture for the Scottish Heart Health Study

MARK WOODWARD*,**, W C S SMITH*,{dagger} and HUGH TUNSTALL-PEDOE*

*Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School Dundee DD1 9SY, UK.
{dagger}The Leprosy Mission Katong, PO Box 149, Singapore 9143.

Woodward M (Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK), Smith WCS and Tunstall-Pedoe H. Bias from missing values: Sex differences in implication of failed venepuncture for the Scottish Heart Health Study. International Journal of Epidemiology 1991; 20: 379–383.

Missing values are common in epidemiological data, and yet their possible effect on the results of the investigation is seldom quantified despite the fact that they are a likely source of bias. This paper describes a simple method, based on odds ratios, for assessing whether missing values are likely to cause bias, and for quantifying the magnitude of any such bias. The method is applied to the Scottish Heart Health Study, a study of risk factors for coronary heart disease amongst 10 359 men and women. It is found that, although no bias is apparent in the male subjects, females with missing blood samples are twice as likely to have a history of myocardial infarction than other women. Missing blood samples are shown to be associated with increased body mass index and difficult peripheral veins. The bias caused by the missing female blood samples is considerable, with estimated errors of between 4% and 12% in the mean values of total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, creatinine, uric acid and fibrinogen.

Revised 1 October 1990


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.