Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (33)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KALTER, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by KALTER, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1991 Oxford University Press

research-article

Five-Decade International Trends in the Relation of Perinatal Mortality and Congenital Malformations: Stillbirth and Neonatal Death Compared

HAROLD KALTER

Children's Hospital Research Foundation and Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229, USA.

The relation between long-term temporal trends in stillbirth and neonatal death rates and the congenital malformation frequencies in such deaths were analysed, using data from hospital-based European, USA, and Canadian reports published from 1950. In the last 50 years the overall perinatal mortality rate has fairly steadily improved, decreasing by 65–80%. This was accomplished by the control of some serious problems of early life. However lingering disorders form an ever larger proportion of the causes of perinatal mortality. Among the most prominent of these are congenital malformations, accounting for nearly 30% of perinatal deaths at present. However, this figure conceals important differences between stillbirths and early neonatal deaths. For example, although stillbirth and early neonatal mortality rates have decreased to similar extents during these years, congenital malformations, which were almost equally frequent causes of death in both of them at the beginning of this period, are now about twice as common in early neonatal (one week) deaths as in stillbirths. Other differences between them are in birthweight-related malformation frequencies and in characteristic arrays of malformations. The significance of these patterns and of some geographical variations, and the likelihood of continuing improvement in the stillbirth and early neonatal mortality rates are discussed.

Revised 1 June 1990


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
E. A. Nohr, B. H. Bech, M. J. Davies, M. Frydenberg, T. B. Henriksen, and J. Olsen
Prepregnancy Obesity and Fetal Death: A Study Within the Danish National Birth Cohort
Obstet. Gynecol., August 1, 2005; 106(2): 250 - 259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
J C Becher, J E Bell, J W Keeling, N McIntosh, and B Wyatt
The Scottish perinatal neuropathology study: clinicopathological correlation in early neonatal deaths
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., September 1, 2004; 89(5): F399 - F407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
S Dastgiri, W H Gilmour, and D H Stone
Survival of children born with congenital anomalies
Arch. Dis. Child., May 1, 2003; 88(5): 391 - 394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
S Dastgiri, D H Stone, C Le-Ha, and W H Gilmour
Prevalence and secular trend of congenital anomalies in Glasgow, UK
Arch. Dis. Child., April 1, 2002; 86(4): 257 - 263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
A. J Wilcox
On the importance--and the unimportance-- of birthweight
Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2001; 30(6): 1233 - 1241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
A. Rosano, L. D Botto, B. Botting, and P. Mastroiacovo
Infant mortality and congenital anomalies from 1950 to 1994: an international perspective
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, September 1, 2000; 54(9): 660 - 666.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.