Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by NAJEM, G R.
Right arrow Articles by FEUERMAN, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by NAJEM, G R.
Right arrow Articles by FEUERMAN, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1990 Oxford University Press

research-article

Changing Patterns of Ischaemic Heart Disease Mortality in New Jersey 1968–1982, and the Relationship with Urbanization

G REZA NAJEM*, DUNCAN E HUTCHEON** and MARTIN FEUERMAN{dagger}

*Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health.
**Department of Pharmacology and Medicine.
{dagger}Department of Management and Information System Services, Division of Research and Biostatistics, UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School 185 South Orange Avenue, Newark, New Jersey 07103–2757, USA

Najem GR (Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School, 185 South Orange Avenue, Newark, New Jersey, 07103-2757, USA). Hutcheon DE and Feuerman, M. Changing patterns of ischaemic heart disease. Mortality in New Jersey 1968–1982, and the relationship with urbanization. International Journal of Epidemiology 1990; 19: 26–31.

Geographical variations in the declining rates of ischaemic heart disease (IHD) mortality may provide clues about various environmental risk factors responsible as a mass influence on the population IHD rate. The rate of IHD decline in 18 of 21 NJ counties was 2 to 45% less than the USA national rate of decline. The overall decline of IHD mortality in New Jersey (NJ) counties lagged significantly (p<0.05 to p<0.0003) behind the national trend. Age-adjusted mortality rate (AAMR) for IHD in NJ's 21 counties were 4% to 56% higher than the US rates. The IHD mortality rate of 14 of 21 NJ, counties and the entire state were significantly (p<0.005 to p<0.000001) above the US rate. Highly urbanized, industrialized, and densely populated NJ counties had the highest IHD rates. In these highly urbanized, industrialized and overcrowded NJ counties the AAMR for IHD was significnatly higher and the IHD decline was significantly lower than that in the US. There was a significant (p<0.02 to p<0.00001) inverse association between annual per capita income and IHD rates. These data suggest that a high degree of urbanization, extensive industrialization, high population density and low socioeconomic status were acting as mass influences on the NJ population IHD rate.

Revised 1 May 1989


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HEALTH PROMOT INTHome page
Y. Fukuda, K. Nakamura, and T. Takano
Wide range of socioeconomic factors associated with mortality among cities in Japan
Health Promot. Int., June 1, 2004; 19(2): 177 - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
E. Barnett and J. Halverson
Local Increases in Coronary Heart Disease Mortality Among Blacks and Whites in the United States, 1985-1995
Am J Public Health, September 1, 2001; 91(9): 1499 - 1506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
A. Tanaka, T. Takano, K. Nakamura, and S. Takeuchi
Health Levels Influenced by Urban Residential Conditions in a Megacity Tokyo
Urban Stud, June 1, 1996; 33(6): 879 - 894.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Transcult NursHome page
A. F. Z. Wenger
Transcultural Nursing and Health Care Issues in Urban and Rural Contexts
J Transcult Nurs, January 1, 1992; 3(2): 4 - 10.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.