Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HEBERT, J. R
Right arrow Articles by TOPOROFF, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HEBERT, J. R
Right arrow Articles by TOPOROFF, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1989 Oxford University Press

research-article

Dietary Exposures and Other Factors of Possible Prognostic Significance in Relation to Tumour Size and Nodal Involvement in Early-Stage Breast Cancer

JAMES R HEBERT*,{dagger} and ELANAH TOPOROFF{ddagger}

*Division of Epidemiology, American Health Foundation 320 East 43rd Street, New York, NY 10017, USA
{dagger}Current address: Division of Preventive and Behavioural Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School 55 Lake Avenue North, Worcester, MA 01655, USA
{ddagger}Current Address: University of Hawaii, School of Public Health, International Centre for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, 1960 East-West Rd, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA

Hebert J R (Division of Preventive and Behavioural Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue North, Worcester MA 01655, USA) and Toporoff E. Dietary exposures and other factors of possible prognostic significance in relation to tumour size and nodal involvement in early-stage breast cancer. International Journal of Epidemiology, 1989, 18: 518–526.

In this case series study of 546 early-stage breast cancer patients we examined the relationship between tumour size and axillary nodal involvement separately in relation to other factors suggested to be of prognostic significance in breast cancer. Relationships were modelled using two-stage general linear models stratified by menopausal status. In stage I models, tumour size (diameter in cm) and nodal involvement, expressed as the log• (number of positive nodes/total nodes examined), were regressed on an array of socio-demographic and reproduction-related variables as well as smoking and drinking. In stage II models we entered the same dependent variables, the linear predictor score from stage I modelling, estimated total calories consumed and calorie-adjusted fat, fibre and vitamin A intake, as well as serum cholesterol, body mass index, and oestrogen and progesterone receptor status. Using this very conservative analytical technique, we found that, among premenopausal women, for every gram increase in estimated calorie-adjusted daily fat intake there was a 0.09 mm increase in tumour diameter (T = 2.58, P = 0.01). Also among premenopausal women, we observed an inverse relationship between nodal involvement and fibre intake (g/d) and nodal involvement (B = –0.058, T = –2.11, P = 0.04). For postmenopausal women we observed an inverse relationship with serum cholesterol (mg/dl) (B = –0.005, T = –1.85, P = 0.07). Other findings of interest include the absence of background factor effects in premenopausal women, the lack of nutritional effects and the consistency of a protective effect of education among postmenopausal women, and a relationship between hormone receptor levels and tumour size among premenopausal women. Results are discussed in light of their possible aetiological significance, and as a guide for future investigations.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
J. Brown, T. Byers, K. Thompson, B. Eldridge, C. Doyle, A. M. Williams, and American Cancer Society Workgroup on Nutrition and
Nutrition During and After Cancer Treatment: A Guide for Informed Choices by Cancer Survivors
CA Cancer J Clin, May 1, 2001; 51(3): 153 - 181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.