Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LYON, J. L
Right arrow Articles by MOSER, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LYON, J. L
Right arrow Articles by MOSER, R., JR
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1989 Oxford University Press

research-article

Uncertainty in the Diagnosis of Histologically Confirmed Pancreatic Cancer Cases

JOSEPH L LYON, LINDA M ROBISON and ROYCE MOSER, JR

Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah Medical School 50 North Medical Drive, Room 1C26, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.

Lyon J L (Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah Medical School, 50 North Medical Drive, Room 1C26, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA), Robison L M and Moser Jr. R. Uncertainty in the diagnosis of histologically confirmed pancreatic cancer cases. International Journal of Epidemiology 1989, 18: 305–308.

In doing a case-control study of cancer of the exocrine pancreas, a set of criteria was developed to classify cancer of the exocrine pancreas by pathological and diagnostic data as to the probability that the tumor arose in the pancreas. We applied these criteria to the records of 125 consecutive patients between the ages of 40–79 years who were identified as having adenocarcinomas of the exocrine pancreas from a population-based cancer registry. We found that histological confirmation by a cancer registry does not guarantee the site of origin is the pancreas. Of the histologically confirmed cases meeting our study criteria, 28.7% may not have arisen in the pancreas. Forty-seven per cent of non-histologically confirmed cases, which most studies exclude, were almost certainly of pancreatic origin based on computerized tomogram (CT) scan and/or surgical palpation and subsequent clinical course. These figures may underestimate the full extent of diagnostic misclassification, especially in older age groups. We conclude that epidemiological studies of cancer of the exocrine pancreas need more uniform criteria for defining cases, and these critieria should take into account uncertainty as to site of origin. Sufficient detail of our scheme is presented so it can be applied in other studies.

Received 1 November 1988


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
J. Alguacil, M. Porta, F. G Benavides, N. Malats, M. Kogevinas, E. Fernandez, A. Carrato, J. Rifa, and L. Guarner
Occupation and pancreatic cancer in Spain: a case-control study based on job titles
Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2000; 29(6): 1004 - 1013.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.