Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (68)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PEARCE, N.
Right arrow Articles by FRASER, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by PEARCE, N.
Right arrow Articles by FRASER, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1989 Oxford University Press

research-article

Case-Control Studies of Cancer in New Zealand Electrical Workers

NEIL PEARCE*, JOHN REIF** and JAMES FRASER{dagger}

*Department of Community Health, Wellington School of Medicine, Wellington Hospital Wellington, New Zealand.
**Department of Environmental Health, Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
{dagger}National Health Statistics Centre Wellington, New Zealand.

Pearce N (Department of Community Health, Wellington School of Medicine, Wellington Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand), Reif J and Fraser J. Case-control studies of cancer in New Zealand Electrical Workers. International Journal of Epidemiology 1989, 18: 55–59.

A series of reports, including a New Zealand case-control study, have suggested that electrical workers are at increased risk of leukaemia. We report here a further series of case-control studies based on the New Zealand Cancer Registry. These involved 19 904 male patients registered with cancer for the period 1980–1984 who were aged 20 years or more at time of registration. For each cancer site, the registrations for other sites formed the control group. Three main findings emerged. First, there is an elevated leukaemia risk in New Zealand electrical workers (odds ratio (OR) = 1.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04–2.52), but little evidence of increased risks for other cancer sites. Second, contrary to other published studies, the increased risk was primarily for chronic leukaemia (OR = 2.12) rather than acute leukaemia (OR = 1.25), and for lymphatic leukaemia (OR = 1.73) rather than myeloid leukaemia (OR = 1.22). Third, the increased risk was strongest for certain categories of electrical work including radio and television repairers (OR = 7.86, 95% CI 2.20–28.09), electricians (OR = 1.68, 95% CI = 0.75– 3.79), linemen (OR = 2.35, 95% CI 0.97–5.70) and power station operators (OR = 3.89, 95% CI 1.00–15.22).

Revised 1 July 1988


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
E V Willett, P A McKinney, N T Fear, R A Cartwright, and E Roman
Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields and acute leukaemia: analysis of a case-control study
Occup. Environ. Med., August 1, 2003; 60(8): 577 - 583.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
L. E. Charles, D. Loomis, C. M. Shy, B. Newman, R. Millikan, L. A. Nylander-French, and D. Couper
Electromagnetic Fields, Polychlorinated Biphenyls, and Prostate Cancer Mortality in Electric Utility Workers
Am. J. Epidemiol., April 15, 2003; 157(8): 683 - 691.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
S. E. Carozza, M. Wrensch, R. Miike, B. Newman, A. F. Olshan, D. A. Savitz, M. Yost, and M. Lee
Occupation and Adult Gliomas
Am. J. Epidemiol., November 1, 2000; 152(9): 838 - 846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.