Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MACKENBACH, J P
Right arrow Articles by VAN DER MAAS, P J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MACKENBACH, J P
Right arrow Articles by VAN DER MAAS, P J
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1988 Oxford University Press

research-article

Regional Differences in Decline of Mortality from Selected Conditions: The Netherlands, 1969–1984

J P MACKENBACH, C W N LOOMAN, A E KUNST, J D HABBEMA and P J VAN DER MAAS

Department of Public Health and Social Medicine, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Msckenbach J P (Department of Public Health and Social Medicine, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands), Looman C W N, Kunst A E, Habbema J D F and van der Maas P J. Regional differences in mortality decline from selected conditions: The Netherlands 1969–1984. International Journal of Epidemiology 1988, 17: 821–829.

In The Netherlands, as in many other industrialized countries, recent mortality developments have been characterized by rapid declines for a number of important causes of death. The results of an analysis of regional variation in mortality decline within The Netherlands are reported, covering the period 1969–1984. The causes of death included in this analysis are Perinatal mortality, Cerebrovascular disease, a more global ‘Amenable’ selection (formed by aggregating a number of causes of death considered to be amenable to medical intervention), Cancer of the stomach, ischaemic heart disease and Traffic accidents.

For Perinatal mortality, Cerebrovascular disease, the ‘Amenable’ selection, and ischaemic heart disease,as well as for Total mortality, declines have not been geographically homogeneous. Perinatal mortality had a tendency to decline faster in regions where starting levels were higher, suggesting a certain convergence. For Cerebrovascular disease and the ‘Amenable’ selection, but especially for ischaemic heart disease, the reverse was true.

A simple correlation analysis shows that for Perinatal mortality, as well as for the ‘Amenable’ selection, mortality declined faster in less urbanized, more peripherally located, lower income areas. There is no association with the presence of a university hospital. This pattern suggests that faster mortality decline for these conditions is due to factors other than faster diffusion of new medical technologies.

For ischaemic heart disease, mortality declined faster in more urbanized, more centrally located, higher income areas. Although this pattern is what one would expect as a result of regional differences in the diffusion of new medical technologies, it may also be due to differences in the diffusion of new lifestyles. The absence of an association with the presence of university hospitals supports the latter view.

It is concluded that the monitoring of changes in mortality at the regional level is an important addition to the more usual analyses of mortality variation at one moment in time.

Revised 1 May 1988


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Scand J Public HealthHome page
R. Westerling
Indicators of "Avoidable" Mortality in Health Administrative Areas in Sweden 1974-1985
Scand J Public Health, September 1, 1993; 21(3): 176 - 187.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.