Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GRUBB, G. S
Right arrow Articles by ROGERS, S. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by GRUBB, G. S
Right arrow Articles by ROGERS, S. M
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1988 Oxford University Press

research-article

A Comparison of Two Cause-of-Death Classification Systems for Deaths among Women of Reproductive Age in Menoufia, Egypt

GARY S GRUBB*, JUDITH A FORTNEY*, SANEYA SALEH{ddagger}, SAAD GADALLA{ddagger}, AHMAD EL-BAZ{dagger}, PAUL FELDBLUM* and SUSAN M ROGERS*

*Family Health International Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
{ddagger}Social Research Center, American University in Cairo Cairo, Egypt
{dagger}Central Agency for Public Mobilization and Statistics, (CAPMAS) Cairo, Egypt

Mortality data ascertained from sources other than a death registration system can validate the accuracy of the system, but this information is rarely obtained. Data on 1979 deaths among reproductive age women were collected in the 1981–1983 Reproductive Age Mortality Survey (RAMOS) in the governorate of Menoufia, Egypt, and compared with data on these deaths as recorded by the Egyptian death registration system. Although the distribution of the causes of death were similar, there were substantial differences between classification systems for deaths due to particular causes. Over half of the deaths classified differently by the systems were those assigned to circulatory disease on the death certificate. In contrast, there was a high rate of agreement between systems in the classification of trauma deaths. About half (52.4%) of cancer deaths had the same she-specific cancer diagnosis assigned by RAMOS. The percentage of deaths assigned to maternal causes was three times higher in RAMOS (19.2%) than on death certificates (6.1%). Reported mortality rates for this often-preventable cause of death have been substantially underestimated in national death registration systems. Such underreporting masks the need for additional prenatal care and maternal hearth programmes.

Revised 1 May 1987


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.