Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BERMAN, S. M
Right arrow Articles by HOGUE, C. J R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BERMAN, S. M
Right arrow Articles by HOGUE, C. J R
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1987 Oxford University Press

research-article

Assessing Sex Differences in Neonatal Survival: A Study of Discordant Twins

STUART M BERMAN*, NANCY J BINKIN and CAROL J R HOGUE

* Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, Center for Prevention Services, Division of Sexually Transmitted Diseases Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA

We identified 1699 liveborn twin pairs, discordant for sex. In this study, which essentially controls for gestational age, race, and maternal risk factors among males and females, there was no significant sex difference (108 male deaths and 103 female deaths) in neonatal mortality (p > 0.50). However, there was a sex difference in intrauterine growth, since 53% of the males, but only 42% of the females had birthweights >2499 grams (p = 0.0002). A differential growth pattern can bias birthweight-specific assessments of survival. Such a bias may have been responsible for our finding that low-birthweight white females had better survival than did males in that category, since there was no such sex difference found among white twins born prematurely (<36 weeks gestation). Therefore, we recommend that accurate assessments of sex differences in neonatal survival should be on the basis of gestational age, controlling for race and maternal risk factors.

Received 1 August 1986


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
J. Katz, K. P West Jr, S. K Khatry, S. C LeClerq, P. Christian, E. K. Pradhan, and S. R. Shrestha
Twinning rates and survival of twins in rural Nepal
Int. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2001; 30(4): 802 - 807.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.