Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PEDERSON, L. L
Right arrow Articles by LEFCOE, N. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by PEDERSON, L. L
Right arrow Articles by LEFCOE, N. M
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1987 Oxford University Press

research-article

A Population Survey in Ontario Regarding Restrictive Measures on Smoking: Relationship of Smoking Status to Knowledge, Attitudes and Predicted Behaviour

LINDA L PEDERSON*, SHELLEY B BULL*, MARY JANE ASHLEY{dagger} and NEVILLE M LEFCOE{ddagger}

* Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Kresge Building, University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7
{dagger} Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, University of Toronto
{ddagger} Departments of Medicine, Victoria Hospital and University of Western Ontario

A population survey of Ontario residents regarding knowledge of the health effects of smoking, attitudes towards restrictive measures, and predicted behaviour was carried out. Telephone responses of 490 current, 290 former, and 581never smokers were compered. For both active and passive smoking, never smokers were most knowledgeable about health effects, former smokers being less knowledgeable, and current smokers least so. While a majority of each smoking status group supported some restriction on smoking in all 13 settings examined, there were consistent differences among the groups as to degree. Never and former smokers were in close agreement and were more restrictive in their attitudes than current smokers. Prohibition was more strongly favoured by all groups for health and day care facilities, schools, stores, and local transit systems than for other settings. While a majority of smokers thought there would be compliance with restrictions, non-smokers were less optimistic. Smokers were less likely than non-smokers to see a role for governments in enactment; municipal involvement was favoured over other levels by all groups. No group indicated much support for enforcement by police. These findings remained when multivariate analyses controlling for inter-group differences in sociodemographic characteristics were carried out.

Received 1 August 1986


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J Public HealthHome page
A. Schumann, U. John, J. R. Thyrian, S. Ulbricht, U. Hapke, and C. Meyer
Attitudes towards smoking policies and tobacco control measures in relation to smoking status and smoking behaviour
Eur J Public Health, October 1, 2006; 16(5): 513 - 519.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
B. D Poland, J. E Cohen, M. J Ashley, E. Adlaf, R. Ferrence, L. L Pederson, S. B Bull, and D. Raphael
Heterogeneity among smokers and non-smokers in attitudes and behaviour regarding smoking and smoking restrictions
Tob. Control, December 1, 2000; 9(4): 364 - 371.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Health Education JournalHome page
P.G. Bolger and S.L. Stewart-Brown
Public attitudes to smoking in Avon
Health Education Journal, January 1, 1990; 49(3): 97 - 100.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.