Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HORNER, R. D
Right arrow Articles by CHIRIKOS, T. N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HORNER, R. D
Right arrow Articles by CHIRIKOS, T. N
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1987 Oxford University Press

research-article

Survivorship Differences in Geographical Comparisons of Cancer Mortality: An Urban-Rural Analysis

RONNIE D HORNER* and THOMAS N CHIRIKOS{dagger}

*Department of Family Medicine. East Carolina University School of Medicine PO Box 1846. Greenville. North Carolina 27834. USA
{dagger}College of Public Health. University of South Florida Tampa. Florida 33612. USA

Epidemiologists have traditionally used geographical comparisons of cancer site-specific mortality rates to draw aetiological inferences about neoplasms. This approach is based on the unproven assumption that cancer mortality and incidence rates are highly correlated within geographical areas. Since mortality is a function of both incidence and survival rates, geographical differences in cancer survivorship may confound area comparison of cancer mortality rates. To test this possibility, the survival experience of white male cancer patients residing in rural and urban areas is examined using cancer registry data. A multi-variable proportional hazards model is specified to determine the unique effect of geographical residence on survival. Only for cancers of the gastro-intestinal (Gl) tract are there statistically significant differences in survivorship by geographical residence. This suggests that for most cancers, survival differences are not likely to play a confounding role in geographical comparisons of cancer mortality rates. However for Gl cancers, survival differences should probably be considered in geographical-oriented analyses and their interpretation.

Received 1 March 1986


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br. J. PsychiatryHome page
L. J. WHALLEY
Early-onset Alzheimer's disease in Scotland: environmental and familial factors
The British Journal of Psychiatry, April 1, 2001; 178 (40): s53 - s59.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.