Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PHOON, W O
Right arrow Articles by LEONG, H K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by PHOON, W O
Right arrow Articles by LEONG, H K
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1987 Oxford University Press

research-article

A Study on the Prevalence of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Among Chinese Adult Males in Singapore

W O PHOON, N P FONG, J LEE and H K LEONG

Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, National University of Singapore Lower Kent Ridge, Singapore 0511

A study was conducted in Singapore on 8829 Chinese men aged 35 years or more to determine whether the prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positivity is associated with the source from which the subjects were recruited, or with occupation as an indicator of socioeconomic status.

The HBsAg prevalence rates were significantly different (p<0.0001) among the five source groups: 8.3% in healthy blood donors, 7.8 in other healthy subjects, 9.2 in non-hepatic outpatients, 10.3 in hospital non-hepatic patients who were not gravely ill, and 11.2 in hospital non-hepatic patients who were gravely ill. After statistical adjustment by multiple logistic regression for age and occupation, the odds ratio (using ‘other healthy subjects’ as the reference group) ranged from 0.98 (95% CL = 0.65–1.47) for healthy blood donors to 1.42 (95% CL = 0.95–2.12) for hospital non-hepatic patients who were gravely ill.

The HBsAg prevalence rates were also significantly different (p<0.0001) among occupations: 8.5% in professional, technical and administrative personnel, 9.7 in clerical, sales and services personnel, 10.3 in agricultural and factory workers and unskilled labourers, and 10.5 among the unemployed and retired. After statistical adjustment for age and source groups, the odds ratio (using professional, technical and administrative subjects as the reference group) ranged from 1.07 (95% CL = 0.99–1.17) for the unemployed and retired subjects, to 1.19 (95% CL = 0.93–1.53) for agricultural and factory workers and unskilled labourers.

Received 1 February 1986


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.