Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (40)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HISLOP, T G.
Right arrow Articles by KAN, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HISLOP, T G.
Right arrow Articles by KAN, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1986 Oxford University Press

research-article

Relationship between Risk Factors for Breast Cancer and Hormonal Status

T GREGORY HISLOP*, ANDREW J COLDMAN*, J MARK ELWOOD{dagger}, DIANE H SKIPPEN* and LISA KAN*

* Division of Epidemiology, Biometry and Occupational Oncology, Cancer Control Agency of British Columbia 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 4E6, Canada
{dagger} Department of Community Health, University of Nottingham Nottingham, England.

A total of 512 breast cancer patients and 540 controls were compared to examine the risk factors for different categories of breast cancer as defined by age, menopausal status and estrogen receptor (ER) tumor status. Significant differences were found by menopausal status, for age at first birth and age at menarche for all women, and for age at first birth and family history for women between 45 and 54 years old. No significant differences were found with ER status alone; however there was a significant difference between ER status and body weight in premenopausal women; the above significant differences with menopausal status were not found when stratified by ER tumour status. These findings support the hypothesis for aetiological differences for pre- and postmenopausal breast cancer and suggest that ER tumour status may influence the risk associated with body weight.

Received 1 February 1986


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
L. U. Rosenberg, K. Einarsdottir, E. I. Friman, S. Wedren, P. W. Dickman, P. Hall, and C. Magnusson
Risk Factors for Hormone Receptor-Defined Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2006; 15(12): 2482 - 2488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. A. Adams, C. E. Matthews, J. R. Hebert, C. G. Moore, J. E. Cunningham, X.-O. Shu, J. Fulton, Y. Gao, and W. Zheng
Association of physical activity with hormone receptor status: the shanghai breast cancer study.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2006; 15(6): 1170 - 1178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
G. A. Colditz
Epidemiology and Prevention of Breast Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2005; 14(4): 768 - 772.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. D. Althuis, J. H. Fergenbaum, M. Garcia-Closas, L. A. Brinton, M. P. Madigan, and M. E. Sherman
Etiology of Hormone Receptor-Defined Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2004; 13(10): 1558 - 1568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
G. A. Colditz, B. A. Rosner, W. Y. Chen, M. D. Holmes, and S. E. Hankinson
Risk Factors for Breast Cancer According to Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Status
J Natl Cancer Inst, February 4, 2004; 96(3): 218 - 228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
J. J. Dignam, K. Wieand, K. A. Johnson, B. Fisher, L. Xu, and E. P. Mamounas
Obesity, Tamoxifen Use, and Outcomes in Women With Estrogen Receptor-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst, October 1, 2003; 95(19): 1467 - 1476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. M. Enger, R. K. Ross, A. Paganini-Hill, C. L. Carpenter, and L. Bernstein
Body Size, Physical Activity, and Breast Cancer Hormone Receptor Status: Results from Two Case-Control Studies
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2000; 9(7): 681 - 687.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. S. Coughlin and M. Piper
Genetic Polymorphisms and Risk of Breast Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 1999; 8(11): 1023 - 1032.
[Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.