Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SITTHI-AMORN, C.
Right arrow Articles by SONPANYA, N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SITTHI-AMORN, C.
Right arrow Articles by SONPANYA, N
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1986 Oxford University Press

research-article

Mail Follow-up of Chronic Diseases in Northeast Thailand

CHITR SITTHI-AMORN, S TUSSANIYOM, S SOONTRAPA, V VONGSANGNAK and N SONPANYA

Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University Kohn Kaen, Thailand

The use of mailed questionnaires to follow patients with chronic diseases was investigated in 650 patients from 16 provinces of northeastern Thailand who sought care at the University Hospital. The overall response rate to the first mail follow-up was 73.2%. If all three mail follow-ups were considered, up to 86.6% of all patients responded. The demographic variables appeared to be similar between the respondents and the non-respondents. Cancer and deterioration of disease status had an adverse effect on the response rate. Utilization of peripheral health centres to supplement mail follow-up in these sub-populations was suggested.

Almost 78% of 650 patients were followed and interviewed to assess the validity of mailed response. The percentages of respondents and non-respondents who were followed were almost identical. Of the 504 patients followed, 92% were located. The successful location was over 98% for the respondents and only 54% for non-respondents.

The agreement of some parameter such as death and survival time after discharge was very high between mail and intensive follow-up data. Less distinctive events had lower agreement rates.

Some precautionary notes were voiced and the possibility of extension of mail follow-up in collection of information and supervision of health care was suggested.

Revised 1 April 1985


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.