Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HOWE, G. R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HOWE, G. R
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1986 Oxford University Press

research-article

Methodological Issues in Cohort Studies: Point Estimators of the Rate Ratio

GEOFFREY R HOWE

National Cancer Inetitute of Canada Epidemiology Unit, University of Toronto 12 Queen's Park Cres. West, 3rd floor McMurrich Building Faculty of Medicine Toronto, Canada M5S 1A8.

Computer simulation has been used to study the behaviour of four estimators of the common rate ratio estimated from cohort data, in terms of bias and root mean square error. It is concluded that the maximum likelihood estimator is the preferable approach, though an excellent approximation to this is yielded by the analogue of the Mantel-Haenszel estimator. When the number of observed cases in the referent group is large, it may be preferable to present the results as the standardized mortality (morbidity) ratio, though under these circumstances all four estimators tend to the same value. The O/E estimator proposed for use with clinical trials data under some situations is noticeably biased and inefficient and therefore should be avoided.

Revised 1 May 1985


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.