Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (27)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by NG, T. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by NG, T. P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1986 Oxford University Press

research-article

A Case-Referent Study of Cancer of the Nasal Cavity and Sinuses in Hong Kong

TZE PIN NG

Occupational Health Division, Labour Department Hong Kong

A case-referent study of cancer of the nasal cavity and sinuses (NCS) was conducted in Hong Kong where textile and garment manufacturing are major industries. The study population included 225 nasal cavity and sinus cancer cases (NCS), 224 nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) referents, and 226 all other malignancies (AOM) referents, diagnosed at the Institute of Radiology and Oncology from 1974 through 1981. A strikingly close similarity in occupational distribution between NPC referents and NCS cases was found. Compared to AOM referents, statistically significantly elevated odds ratios of association with nasal cavity and sinuses cancer were found among textile workers (OR, 2.93), fishermen (OR, 3.38), farmers (OR, 1.94) and construction workers (OR, 1.91) particularly for textile workers and fishermen with more than 15 years of employment (textile workers, OR 7.39), (fishermen, OR 3.72). Among textile workers, somewhat more elevated risks were found among weavers (OR, 4.72) after controlling for employment years. Slightly but not statistically significant elevated relative risks of NCS were also associated with those who smoked (OR 1.40) and those who were locally born in Hong Kong (OR 1.53). The known risk of nasopharyngeal cancer among fishermen and those originating from the southern Chinese province of Guangdong was also evident. These findings confirm an association of nasal cavity and sinuses cancer with textile work which has been previously suggested by other studies and provide new leads for further research on the environmental aetiology of cancer of the nasal cavity, sinuses, and nesopharynx.

Revised 1 August 1985


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
W.-L. Hsu, J.-Y. Chen, Y.-C. Chien, M.-Y. Liu, S.-L. You, M.-M. Hsu, C.-S. Yang, and C.-J. Chen
Independent Effect of EBV and Cigarette Smoking on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A 20-Year Follow-Up Study on 9,622 Males without Family History in Taiwan
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2009; 18(4): 1218 - 1226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
E. T. Chang and H.-O. Adami
The enigmatic epidemiology of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2006; 15(10): 1765 - 1777.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Toxicol Ind HealthHome page
G. Mastrangelo, U. Fedeli, E. Fadda, G. Milan, and J. H Lange
Epidemiologic evidence of cancer risk in textile industry workers: a review and update
Toxicology and Industrial Health, May 1, 2002; 18(4): 171 - 181.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A. Hildesheim, M. Dosemeci, C.-C. Chan, C.-J. Chen, Y.-J. Cheng, M.-M. Hsu, I-H. Chen, B. F. Mittl, B. Sun, P. H. Levine, et al.
Occupational Exposure to Wood, Formaldehyde, and Solvents and Risk of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2001; 10(11): 1145 - 1153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.