Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (30)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by TSAI, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by WEN, C P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by TSAI, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by WEN, C P
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1986 Oxford University Press

review-article

A Review of Methodological Issues of the Standardized Mortality Ratio (SMR) in Occupational Cohort Studies

SHAN POU TSAI* and C P WEN

Gulf Oil Corporation, Medical and Health Resources Division PO Box 2100, Houston. Texas 77252 USA

* Present address: Epidemiology and Health Research, Tenneco Inc. PO Box 2511, T-945, Houston, Texas 77001, USA.

This paper is a review and clarification of methodological issues related to the standardized mortality ratio (SMR), widely used in occupational epidemiology. Although the SMR seems to be a simple statistic, it can be misused and misinterpreted. The paper discusses SMRs in relation to age-specific mortality ratios, relative risk, life expectancy, and statistics derived from direct standardization. Inter-SMR comparisons and the effect of the choice of the comparison population on the SMR are also discussed.

Mathematical and empirical review of SMR use has led to the development of a correction procedure which permits direct comparisons of two SMRs by adjusting for the age distributions of the two populations. The paper also proposes a method for testing the trend of age-specific mortality ratios (MRs). If MRs are homogeneous, this method can also be used to compare two SMRs. If MRs are not homogeneous, the relative risk between two sets of age-specific MRs can be tested for significance, but no summary index, including the SMR, can accurately describe the mortality experience over the entire age range.

It is suggested that the summary statistics of a cohort mortality experience should include relative risk, attributable risk, and life expectancy. These statistics are complementary and can be derived or approximated from the data that generated the SMR. A valid risk assessment should weigh the evidence from all three summary statistics.

Received 1 May 1985


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Int J EpidemiolHome page
C. P. Wen, S. P Tsai, Y.-T. Shih, and W.-S. I. Chung
Bridging the gap in life expectancy of the aborigines in Taiwan
Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2004; 33(2): 320 - 327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Int J EpidemiolHome page
D. Lai, F. Guo, and R. J Hardy
Standardized mortality ratio and life expectancy: a comparative study of Chinese mortality
Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2000; 29(5): 852 - 855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
M. M FINKELSTEIN;, B. J DIVINE, C. M HARTMAN, and J. K WENDT
Update of the Texaco mortality study 1947-93: part II
Occup. Environ. Med., February 1, 2000; 57(2): 143 - 144.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.