Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HESSEL, P. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HESSEL, P. A
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1986 Oxford University Press

research-article

Terminal Digit Preference in Blood Pressure Measurements: Effects on Epidemiological Associations

PATRICK A HESSEL

Epidemiology Research Unit PO Box 4584, Johannesburg, 2000, South Africa

A study was conducted to determine the extent of terminal digit preference in recording blood pressures in an industrial screening programme and its effect on the estimates of the associations between blood pressure and both age and body mass index (BMI). The results showed that 78.5% of systolic and 74.2% of diastolic blood pressure readings were digit preferenced (p<0.0001) and that the examining doctors were least likely to preference their readings near the diagnostically important cut-off points of 150 mmHg systolic and 90 mmHg diastolic. Digit preferencing did not generally affect estimates of the slopes and intercepts of the relationships between blood pressure and age or BMI however, the associations between blood pressure and both age and BMI showed greater error variance when digit preferenced readings were used compared to non-digit preferenced readings. Digit preferencing would have the effect of reducing the power of statistical tests thereby making it more difficult to assess associations between blood pressure and other potential risk factors.

Revised 1 May 1985


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 CirculationHome page
R. Din-Dzietham, Y. Liu, M.-V. Bielo, and F. Shamsa
High Blood Pressure Trends in Children and Adolescents in National Surveys, 1963 to 2002
Circulation, September 25, 2007; 116(13): 1488 - 1496.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J EpidemiolHome page
S. L. Crawford, C. B. Johannes, and R. K. Stellato
Assessment of Digit Preference in Self-reported Year at Menopause: Choice of an Appropriate Reference Distribution
Am. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2002; 156(7): 676 - 683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ChestHome page
A. Lopez-Encuentra, J. L. Duque-Medina, R. Rami-Porta, A. G. de la Camara, and P. Ferrando
Staging in Lung Cancer: Is 3 cm a Prognostic Threshold in Pathologic Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Cancer? : A Multicenter Study of 1,020 Patients
Chest, May 1, 2002; 121(5): 1515 - 1520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 HypertensionHome page
K. M. Rose, D. K. Arnett, R. C. Ellison, and G. Heiss
Skip Patterns in DINAMAP-Measured Blood Pressure in 3 Epidemiological Studies
Hypertension, May 1, 2000; 35(5): 1032 - 1036.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.