© 1985 Oxford University Press
research-article |
A Computer Simulation of the EPI Survey Strategy




* Division of Public Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA 01003, USA
** Division of Information Systems Support, World Health Organization 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
Diarrhoeal Diseases Control Program, World Health Organization 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
Epidemiology and Statistical Methodology Unit, World Health Organization 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
Epidemiology and Statistical Methodology Unit, World Health Organization 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
Expanded Programme on Immunization, World Health Organization 1211 Geneva, Switzerland
Lemeshow S (Division of Public Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA 01003, USA), Tserkovnyi A G, Tulloch J L, Dowd J E, Lwanga S K and Keja J. A computer simulation of the EPI survey strategy. Internationa Journal of Epidemiology 1985, 14: 473481.
A Monte Carlo simulation study was designed to evaluate the sample survey technique currently used by the Expanded Programme on Immunization(EPI) of the World Health Organization. Of particular interest was how the EPI strategy compared to a more traditional sampling strategy with respect to bias and variability of estimates. It was also of interest to investigate whether the estimates of population vaccination coverage were accurate to within 10 percentage points of the actual levels. It was found that within particular clusters, the EPI method was particularly sensitive to pocketing of vaccinated individuals, but the more traditional method gave more accurate and less variable results under a variety of conditions. However, the stated goal of the EPI, of being able to produce population estimates accurate to within 10 percentage points of the true levels in the population, was satisfied in the artificially created populations studied.
Received 1 January 1985
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. L. Vanden Eng, A. Wolkon, A. S. Frolov, D. J. Terlouw, M. J. Eliades, K. Morgah, V. Takpa, A. Dare, Y. K. Sodahlon, Y. Doumanou, et al. Use of Handheld Computers with Global Positioning Systems for Probability Sampling and Data Entry in Household Surveys Am J Trop Med Hyg, August 1, 2007; 77(2): 393 - 399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. T Luman, A. Worku, Y. Berhane, R. Martin, and L. Cairns Comparison of two survey methodologies to assess vaccination coverage Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2007; 36(3): 633 - 641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Bostoen and Z. Chalabi Optimization of household survey sampling without sample frames Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2006; 35(3): 751 - 755. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. B. Spiegel, P. Salama, S. Maloney, and A. van der Veen Quality of Malnutrition Assessment Surveys Conducted During Famine in Ethiopia JAMA, August 4, 2004; 292(5): 613 - 618. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Fitzner, J.-F. Aguilera, A. Yameogo, P. Duclos, and Y. J. F. Hutin Injection practices in Burkina Faso in 2000 Int. J. Qual. Health Care, August 1, 2004; 16(4): 303 - 308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Milligan, A. Njie, and S. Bennett Comparison of two cluster sampling methods for health surveys in developing countries Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2004; 33(3): 469 - 476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



