Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GEHLBACH, S H
Right arrow Articles by ROBERTS, C J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by GEHLBACH, S H
Right arrow Articles by ROBERTS, C J
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1985 Oxford University Press

other

Epidemiology for Medical Students: A Controlled Trial of Three Teaching Methods

S H GEHLBACH, S C FARROW, F G R FOWKES, R R WEST and C J ROBERTS

Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Welsh National School of Medicine, Heath Park Cardiff CF4 4XN, UK

Reprint requests to: S C Farrow at above address.

Gehlbach S H (Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Welsh National School of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XN, UK), Farrow S C, Fowkes F G R, West R R and Roberts C J. Epidemiology for medical students: a controlled trial of three teaching methods. International Journal of Epidemiology 1985, 14: 178–181.

Medical students taking a course in epidemiology for clinical practice were taught by either lectures, small group seminars or self-learning packages. Examination performances were no different for the three groups, but self-perceived mastery of learning objectives, and satisfaction with the course were higher for students who received self-learning packages. Sixty per cent of self instruction students found the teaching method was successful compared with 37% of the seminar students and only 19% who received lectures. A combination of self-instructional package and seminar would seem to hold most promise for a workable and effective course.

Received 1 July 1983


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.