Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (53)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CLARKSON, J. A
Right arrow Articles by FINE, P. E M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by CLARKSON, J. A
Right arrow Articles by FINE, P. E M
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1985 Oxford University Press

research-article

The Efficiency of Measles and Pertussis Notification in England and Wales

JACQUELINE A CLARKSON and PAUL E M FINE

Ross Institute, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Keppel Street, London WCIE 7HT, UK

Clarkson J A (Ross Institute, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London WC1E 7HT, UK) and Fine P E M. The efficiency of measles and pertussis notification in England and Wales. International Journal of Epidemiology 1985, 14: 153–168.

This paper examines methods for estimating the efficiency of measles and pertussis notification with particular reference to England and Wales. Crude estimates are obtained from a comparison of annual numbers of births and notifications, and this approach is modified to include detailed age-specific data. Other sources of data, notably the Hospital In-Patient Enquiry, are used to give detailed estimates over time. These analyses provide evidence for a strong positive correlation between notification efficiency and incidence for both diseases and for a dramatic fall in the notification efficiency for pertussis between 1957 and 1976. This decrease is of particular interest insofar as it could explain in part the apparent fall in size of successive pertussis epidemics during that period. It is estimated that since 1976 the spotter practices of the Royal College of General Practitioners General Practice Research Unit have been approximately 1.5 times more efficient at reporting measles and 2.5 times more efficient at reporting pertussis than the national average for reporting to the Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. Finally it is noted that estimates of notification efficiency are positively correlated with the assumed level of vaccine efficacy, and that all these methods require assumptions concerning the proportion of vaccinations which are recorded, the proportion of vaccinations which are successful in immunizing the recipient, and the proportion of the population which ultimately contracts the infection. In general, measles notification in England and Wales is considerably better than that for pertussis, being of the order of 40–60% for the former and only 5–25% for the latter.

Revised 1 July 1984


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
M.-P. Preziosi, A. Yam, S. G. F. Wassilak, L. Chabirand, A. Simaga, M. Ndiaye, M. Dia, F. Dabis, and F. Simondon
Epidemiology of Pertussis in a West African Community before and after Introduction of a Widespread Vaccination Program
Am. J. Epidemiol., May 15, 2002; 155(10): 891 - 896.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
T. J. Doyle, M. K. Glynn, and S. L. Groseclose
Completeness of Notifiable Infectious Disease Reporting in the United States: An Analytical Literature Review
Am. J. Epidemiol., May 1, 2002; 155(9): 866 - 874.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
P. Rohani, D. J. Earn, and B. T. Grenfell
Opposite Patterns of Synchrony in Sympatric Disease Metapopulations
Science, October 29, 1999; 286(5441): 968 - 971.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.