Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LLOYD, D M
Right arrow Articles by LEEDER, S R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LLOYD, D M
Right arrow Articles by LEEDER, S R
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1983 Oxford University Press

research-article

Cigarette Smoking and Drug Use in Schoolchildren: III—Evaluation of a Smoking Prevention Education Programme

D M LLOYD*, H M ALEXANDER*, R CALLCOTT*, A J DOBSON{dagger}, G R HARDES{ddagger}, D L O'CONNELL{dagger} and S R LEEDER*

*Faculty of Medicine, University of Newcastle 2308 New South Wales, Australia
{dagger}Faculty of Mathematics, University of Newcastle 2308 New South Wales, Australia
{ddagger}Health Commission of New South Wales (Hunter Region), Newcastle 2300 New South Wales, Australia

A one year randomized controlled trial was used to evaluate the effectiveness of a smoking prevention programme designed by health educationalists for 10–12 year old primary schoolchildren. The study was carried Out in the Hunter Region of New South Wales, Australia, using a sample of over 6000 children which would be large enough to detect, with high probability, differences of about 5% in smoking prevalence between the treatment and control groups. We report the results from the children surveyed in 1979 and 1980, before and after the programme was implemented.

It was found that there were no significant differences in smoking behaviour between treatment and control groups. The changes that the programme did bring about were very small compared with the overall increases in smoking prevalence which occurred during the study period. The programme's effectiveness varied with both the age and sex of the children. It was most successful among older girls, aged 11–12 years, for whom smoking prevalence rates increased from 10.7% in 1979 to 22.6% in 1980 in the treatment group compared with 6.2% to 26.8% in the control group. It was least successful for younger boys, aged 10–11 years. for whom smoking increased from 9.4% to 14.5% in the treatment group compared with 10.3% to 11 .8% in the control group.

Attitudes changed in parallel with changes in smoking behaviour. Changes in knowledge differed only slightly between treatment and control groups. Inadequate implementation of the programme by some teachers may have been associated with adverse effects on the children behaviour, attitudes and knowledge.

Received 1 May 1982


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
M. S. Hwang, K. L. Yeagley, and R. Petosa
A Meta-Analysis of Adolescent Psychosocial Smoking Prevention Programs Published Between 1978 and 1997 in the United States
Health Educ Behav, December 1, 2004; 31(6): 702 - 719.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Education JournalHome page
D. Reid and D. E. Massey
Can school health education be more effective?
Health Education Journal, January 1, 1986; 45(1): 7 - 13.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Education JournalHome page
D. Reid
Prevention of smoking among school children: recommendations for policy development
Health Education Journal, January 1, 1985; 44(1): 3 - 12.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.